4 reasons for local people having different opinions on outcomes of regeneration?
consultation - if consultation occurs with locals before confirmation more likely to be happy with outcomes of regeneration
integration - if companies outside the local area develop plans, local people sceptical about impact of regeneration
timescale
jobs - align with skill set of people that lost their jobs to deindustrialisation
urban strategies regeneration - Salford Quays
in 1980s Salford Docklands dominated by derelict warehouses and infrastructure
series of redevelopment plans saw improved leisure facilities like, Imperial War Museum and BBC and ITV acquiring office space as part of £550 million media city development
most agree there is visual improvement but local people question aspects as post modern architecture that dominates skyline has been lost
urban strategies regeneration - Salford Quays (2)
new apartments are too expensive for locals with 2 bedroom flat overlooking waterfront starts at £400,000 in 2020
many of new jobs in media city were taken by people just relocating to area
the different stakeholders that will assess impact of change regeneration are?
local authorities - use statistics like IMD to judge success of regeneration
national government/authorities - monitor internal and international migration to fill job opportunities
local residents -
local businesses - likely to welcome regeneration as it boosts there business
developers - analyse success in purely monetary terms
how lived experiences affect each stakeholder?
local authorities - some members of local authority may be locals in the authority and want to make a better difference for the area
national governments/authorities - little lived experience
local residents - long term connection people will want to see little drastic change
local businesses - long history businesses in the area may feel threatened by new businesses
developers - little emotional attachment to an area as they have no lived experience