UTILITY

Cards (31)

  • Utility
    Usefulness or practical value of testing to improve efficiency
  • Utility can tell us something about the practical value of the information derived from scores on the test
  • Utility
    Helps us make better decisions
  • Higher criterion-related validity
    Higher utility
  • Cost
    Disadvantages, losses, or expenses both economic and noneconomic terms
  • Benefit
    Profits, gains or advantages
  • The cost of test administration can be well worth it if the results is certain noneconomic benefits
  • Utility Analysis
    Family of techniques that entail a cost-benefit analysis designed to yield information relevant to a decision about the usefulness and/or practical value of a tool of assessment
  • Expectancy table
    Provide an indication that a testtaker will score within some interval of scores on a criterion measure – passing, acceptable, failing
  • Expectancy table might indicate future behaviors, then if successful, the test is working as it should
  • Taylor-Russel Tables

    Provide an estimate of the extent to which inclusion of a particular test in the selection system will improve selection
  • Selection Ratio
    Numerical value that reflects the relationship between the number of people to be hired and the number of people available to be hired
  • Base Rate
    Percentage of people hired under the existing system for a particular position
  • One limitation of Taylor-Russel Tables is that the relationship between the predictor (test) and criterion must be linear
  • Naylor-Shine Tables
    Entails obtaining the difference between the means of the selected and unselected groups to derive an index of what the test is adding to already established procedures
  • Brogden-Cronbach-Gleser Formula

    Used to calculate the dollar amount of a utility gain resulting from the use of a particular selection instrument
  • Utility Gain
    Estimate of the benefit of using a particular test
  • Productivity Gains
    An estimated increase in work output
  • High performing applicants may have been offered in other companies as well
  • The more complex the job, the more people differ on how well or poorly they do that job
  • Cut Score
    Reference point derived as a result of a judgement and used to divide a set of data into two or more classifications
  • Relative Cut Score
    Reference point based on norm-related considerations (norm-referenced)
  • Fixed Cut Scores
    Set with reference to a judgement concerning minimum level of proficiency required
  • Multiple Cut Scores
    Refers to the use of two or more cut scores with reference to one predictor for the purpose of categorization
  • Multiple Hurdle
    Multi-stage selection process, a cut score is in place for each predictor
  • Compensatory Model of Selection
    Assumption that high scores on one attribute can compensate for lower scores
  • Angoff Method

    Setting fixed cut scores, low interrater reliability
  • Known Groups Method
    Collection of data on the predictor of interest from group known to possess and not possess a trait of interest, the determination of where to set cutoff score is inherently affected by the composition of contrasting groups
  • IRT-Based Methods
    Cut scores are typically set based on testtaker's performance across all the items on the test, Item-Mapping Method: arrangement of items in histogram, with each column containing items with deemed to be equivalent value, Bookmark Method: expert places "bookmark" between the two pages that are deemed to separate testtakers who have acquired the minimal knowledge, skills, and/or abilities from those who are not
  • Method of Predictive Yield
    Took into account the number of positions to be filled, projections regarding the likelihood of offer acceptance, and the distribution of applicant scores
  • Discriminant Analysis
    Shed light on the relationship between identified variables and two naturally occurring groups