the participant must give permission to take part knowing the true aims of the study and what they're expected to do
this isn't always convenient and there are ways around it
right to withdraw
participants must have the option to leave the study and withdraw their data at any point
protection from harm
participate must not experience any more harm than they would in every day life
e.g. severe embarrassment would be psychological harm as its distress
confidentiality
all information collected must be published in a way that doesn't identify the participant
from the researcher's POV this is difficult bit they can promise anonymity
this is a legal requirement from the participants POV
deception
when participants have been told a false purpose for the research.
this is sometimes needed to prevent demand characteristics
privacy
some research makes it hard not to invade participants privacy.
e.g. observing someone on a shop, they may not mind being observed in public but it would be unacceptable to observe in their private home
social sensitivity
studies where there are potential social consequences for the participants or the group people represented by the research
.g. bowly monotropy- implications for women who wish to work and not stay home with baby.
do the benefits of research that is 'socially sensitive' outweigh the ethical implications?
Sometimes ethical issues need to be broken to allow us find out about human behaviour which outweighs the ethical issues.
You can deal with this by weighing up costs and benefits before conducting any research or taking care when formulating research questions to ensure they do not offend anyone
paradigm
basic framework of assumption and principals from which community members work.
set of norms which tell a scientist how to think and behave
paradigm shift
when psychologists change from one established way of explaining/ studying a behaviour to a new way due to new/contradictory evidence