describes the mental processes we use when engaging in social interaction
as we make decisions on how to behave based on our understanding of a social situation
perspective taking
our ability to appreciate a social situation from other people's POV
this includes understanding their thoughts and feelings
Selman (1971)
looked at 30 girls and 30 boys (20 aged 4, 5 and 6)
were given scenario where a child called Holly promised her dad she won't climb trees anymore but her friend's kitten was stuck up a tree
the task was to describe how each person in the situation would feel if holly did or didn't climb the tree
proposed 5 stages based on the children's reasoning (0-2)
stage 0: (3-6) socially egocentric - can't distinguish between own emotions and others
stage 1: (6-8) social information role taking - can distinguish between own emotions and others bit only focus on one POV
stage 2: (8-10) self reflective role taking - can put themselves in POV of others and fully appreciate own POV
proposed 5 stages based on children's reasoning (3-4)
stage 3: (10-12) mutual role taking - can see own/others POV at same time, can consider 2 POVs simultaneously
stage 4: (12+) social and conventional system role taking - can see sometimes understanding other POV isn't enough to allow people to reach an agreement
Selman strengths
research support - VALKENBURG suggested perspective taking abilities became more advanced with age and so reduced the number of infant parent conflicts in supermarkets
selman limitations
lack of clarity over precise role of perspective taking: Keller found bullies suffered from no perspective taking impairments
one sided approach to explaining social cognition as there's more factors which are equally as important such as ToM and role of mirror neurons
piaget vs selman
PIAGET: believed in domaingeneral cog dev so believed physical and social perspective taking would occur hand in hand
SELMAN: development of socialperspective taking is a separate process. this is a domainspecific approach to explaining cog dev