atavistic form

    Cards (7)

    • historical approach
      • 1876 Lombroso wrote L'Humo Delinquente in which he said criminals were genetic throwbacks - primitive sub-species biologically different from non-criminals
      • lacked evolutionary development, so their savage and untamed nature meant they found it impossible to adjust to civilised society and would inevitably turn to crime
    • atavistic characteristics
      • Lombroso argued that this sub-type had particular biologically determined characteristics linked to particular crimes, that made criminals physically different from the rest of us
    • atavistic characteristics
      • narrow, sloping brow
      • strong prominent jaw
      • high cheekbones
      • facial asymmetry
      • dark skin
      • extra toe, nipple or fingers
      murderers: bloodshot eyes, curly hair and long ears
      sexual deviants: glinting eyes, swollen, fleshy lips
      fraudsters: thin and 'reedy' lips
      • also said born criminals were insensitive to pain, used criminal slang, had tattoos and were unenployed
    • Lombrosos research
      • examined facial and cranial features of italian convicts
      • examined skulls of 383 dead criminals and 3839 living ones
      • concluded 40% of criminal acts are committed by people with atavistic characteristics
    • S - contribution to criminology
      • credited for shifting criminology to a more scientific realm
      • also, in describing how particular types of people are likely to commit particular types of crime, his theory in many ways was the beginning of criminal profiling
    • W - scientific racism
      • distinct racist undertones within his work
      • many of the features he identified are most likely to be found among people with African descent
      • similarly his description of them being uncivilised and primitive would lend support to eugenic philosophies
      • controversial aspect which could have negative implications for certain people
    • W - contradictory evidence
      • compared 3000 criminals with 3000 non-criminals and found there was no evidence that offenders are a distinct group with unusual facial and cranial characteristics
      • questions his theory that criminals are physically different
    See similar decks