Steiner showed that infants can distinguish between different types of sugar
Menella showed that children who preffered sweeter foods grew taller
Preference for salt
An innate preference that appears at 4 months
Harris found that breastfed babies preferred salted cereal despite not being exposed to salt
Preference for fat
Fat is high in calories, so became an advantage because it was an efficient energy source
Fat increases palatability of foods
Neophobia
An adaptive fear of new foods that helps us to avoid foods that may be harmful, especially as we become more independent
Taste aversion
Seligman suggested idea of biological preparedness
Being able to quickly learn an aversion to harmful foods is adaptive and can increase survival changes
Garcia found that rats could quickly develop taste aversion to poison in order to survive
Torres and Nowson suggested we prefer high fat foods when we are stressed to fuel fight or flight response
Alcock suggested that our food preferences are determined by gut microbes which benefit from the nutrients we consume.
Drewnowski suggested that some people are insensitive to bitter tasting chemical but this may be adaptive because bitter tastes are linked to anti-cancer foods. Shows taste aversions have individual differences
Neophobia is maladaptive as food is now safer than ever but neophobia still limits variety of diet
Cashdan suggested culture plays an important role in determining food preferences which is ignored by evolutionary explanation
Classical conditioning
Preferences for new foods develop because of association with taste we already like, which explains why we often sweeten new foods
Operant conditioning
Parents reinforce food preferences by directly rewarding children when they eat, e.g, with pudding after eating vegetables
Social influences
Social learning theory suggests that family,peers and TV all model eating behaviours and give the child direct and indirect reinforcement.
Birch placed children next to peers with different food preferences, and the children's preferences changed to be more similar to their peers
Cultural influences
Rozin suggested culture/ethnicity is the most reliable predictor of food preference as we learn cultural norms of preference within the family
Little evidence that 'flavour-flavour' learning leads to food preferences
Hare-Bruun showed that social learning effects of TV on unhealthy food preferences was very weak after 6 years, and peers became more influential
Jansen and Tenney showed how children preferred energy-dense drink when modelled by a teacher
Eating behaviour in Western culture has changed dramatically over the last few decades.
46% of food spending in America is on external food sources
The role of the hypothalamus
Regulates level of blood glucose within narrow boundaries by adjusting secretion of insulin and anti-insulin hormones
Lateral hypothalamus (LH)
'Feeding centre' activated when glucose levels drop.
Creates hunger and motivation to eat when released with neuropeptide Y
Ventromedialhypothalamus (VMH)
'Satiety centre' activated when glucose levels rise.
Inhibits LH and creates feeling of fullness
The role of ghrelin
An appetite stimulating hormone secreted by the stomach, detected by the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus and closely asscoiated with feelings of hunger
The role of leptin
An appetite-suppressing hormone secreted by adipose cells involved in satiety mechanisms and cessation of eating
Hetherington and Ranson showed that lesions to VMH in rats caused hyperphagia and obesity. Lesions to LH caused aphagia and starvation
Valassi suggested that there are many biological contributors to eating behaviour such as hormone CCK, serotonin and dopamine
Woods suggested that the glucostatic mechanism was only important in severe energy deprivation and that otherwise, social and cultural factors are more influential
Much of the research is on rats and other animals, so findings are difficult to generalise to human behaviour and therefore have low ecological validity
A better understanding of neuronal and hormonal mechanisms controlling eating behaviour can have therapeutic benefits for both anorexia and obesity
Family systems theory for anorexia
A psychodynamic explanation suggested by Minuchin that views dysfunctional family interaction as a major factor in the development and maintenance of anorexia made up of:
Enmeshment
Overprotectiveness
Rigidity
Conflict avoidance
Autonomy and control
Enmeshment
Family members self identities are tied up with one another. Poorly defined roles and over-involvement leads to refusal to eat as an assertion of independence
Overprotectiveness
Family members reinforce loyalty and dependence by nurturing one another obsessively and self-sacrificing
Rigidity
Stress produces a crisis and family cannot adapt. Child's attempt at independence are thwarted
Conflict avoidance
Family members take all steps to avoid discussion of problems until crisis point
Autonomy and control
Bruch suggested AN sufferer strives to assert their independence against domineering parent by starving themselves
Brockmeyer found that AN patients showed significantly greater desire to be autonomous.
Strauss and Ryan showed AN patients had greater disturbances of autonomy
Aragona suggested that enmeshment is difficult to measure and operationalise so research findings are inconsistent
Robin suggested Behavioural Family Systems Therapy was effective in treating AN, but the study was not blinded and is therefore unreliable
Family dysfunction may be the result of having an AN sufferer in the family, not the cause
Family systems theory can explain AN in females and adolescence, but not in males or at other ages
Social learning theory
A way of explaining behaviour that includes both direct and indirect reinforcement, combining learning theory with the role of cognitive factors, uses: