Statistical infrequency = Occurs when an individual has a less common characteristic (e.g. being more depressed or less intelligent than most of the population)
deviation from social norms =concerns behaviour that is different from the accepted standards of behaviour in a community or society
Failure to function adequately = when someone is unable to cope with ordinary demands of day-to-day living
Deviation from ideal mental health - Marie Jahoda’s (1958):
we have no symptoms or distress
we can cope with stress
we are rational
we can self-actualize
we have realistic views of the world
good self esteem & lack of guilt
independent of other people
successfully work, love, enjoy leisure
Example of statistical infrequency:
Average UK IQ is set at 100
Using normal distribution normal range is 85 - 115
Only 2% of people have an IQ below 70
This would lead to diagnosis of intellectual disability disorder (IDD)
Social norms vary between generations and cultures
Deviation from social norms example:
Antisocial personality disorder (psychopathy)
Symptoms suggest that there is failure to conform to lawful and culturally ethical behaviour
Statistical Infrequency Evaluation 1:
Strength - useful in clinical practice for diagnosis and to assess the severity of symptoms - IQ Example
Statistical Infrequency Evaluation 2:
Weakness - unusual characteristics can be positive as well as negative - having an abnormally high IQ can be positive but according to statistical infrequency it is a negative
Statistical Infrequency Evaluation 3:
Strength - some 'abnormal' people may benefit from being classed as abnormal - low IQ can lead to a diagnosis that can help them in everyday life
Deviation from social norms Evaluation 1:
Strength - useful in clinical practice - can help diagnose antisocial personality diagnosis - help to improve lives of people suffering with those disorders
Deviation from social norms Evaluation 2:
Weakness - social norms vary between cultures - someone from another group may class someone as abnormal using their standards
difficult to judge deviation from social norms across different situations and cultures
Someone is failing to function when the cannot hold down a job or maintain relationships with people around them
Example of failure to function adequately:
An individual must also be failing to function adequately before they are diagnosed with disorders such as intellectual disability disorder
Deviation from ideal mental health = When someone does not meet a set of criteria for good mental health
Failure to function adequately Evaluation 1:
Strength - represents a sensible threshold for when people need professional help - means that treatment and services can be targeted to those who need it most
Failure to function adequately Evaluation 2:
Weakness - labels non-standard lifestyle choices as abnormal when the person may have chosen to live that lifestyle - restricts peoples freedom of choice
Deviation from ideal mental health evaluation 1:
Strength - highly comprehensive - a checklist that can be applied to everyone and is easy to access - helps psychologists universally agree
Deviation from ideal mental health evaluation 2:
Weakness - aren't easy applicable across all cultures - difficult to apply to everyone in society
Deviation from ideal mental health evaluation 3:
Weakness - Jahoda's criteria are very high standards and its hard for everyone to achieve all of them at the same time
When is someone failing to function adequately:
no longer conforming to standard interpersonal rules (personal space)
when a person experiences severe personal distress
when a persons behaviour becomes dangerous or irrational