another economic theory including ideas about balance rather than profit
equity is fairness, walster - both partners level of profit are roughly same , not equality where rewards and costs are same
lack of equity where one over or under benefitting causes dissatisfaction, under is most dissatisfaction eg shame and anger
satisfaction is about perceived fairness
ratio not size eg if one outs a lot in but gets a lot back then fair eg night shift
ao1
consequence of inequity, strong correlation beteeeen perceived inequity and dissatisfaction
change in level if perceived equity over time makes us more dissatisfied eg at start natural to contribute more than you receive, but if time passes and no change then dissatisfied
dealing with inequity, under ben motivated to make more equitable as long as believe possible and relationship salvageable, more unfair thr harder to revive equity
cognitive outcome, revise perception of profit so relationship seems more equitable
strength
research support
Utne survey. 118 recent married couples, at least 2 years, measured equity on self report scales, those considered equitable most satisfied
limitation
culture bound
Ryan - individualistic US considered most satisfying when equitable but collective Jamaica most satisfied when overbenefitting
both men and women
counter limitation
equity may not be feature of satisfaction
McQuinn, equity didn’t increase overtime as predicted
relationships which ended or continued didn’t differ in terms of equity
other variables eg SD more important
limitation
individual differences
not all partners concerned about equity
Huseman, some are benevolent prepared to contribute more and some sre entitleds