Ainsworth

Cards (11)

  • Mary Ainsworth: 'Strange Situation' 1978
    • American-candian developmental Psychologist
    • expanded on Bowlby's claims
    • introduced terms: separation anxiety and stranger anxiety
  • Type A: Insecure Avoidant
    Characteristics of Infants:
    • they do not seek contact with attachment figures when distressed
    • very independent of the attachment figure both physically and emotionally
    During Ainsworth's Study:
    • rarely cried when mother left the room and showed little attention to her upon her return
    Characteristics of Mothers:
    • insensitive caregiver and rejecting of their needs
    • angry or hostile
    • attachment figure may withdraw from helping during difficult tasks and is often unavailable during times of emotional distress
    • 20-22%
  • Type B: Secure Attachment
    Characteristics of Infants:
    • use the attachment figure as a safe base to explore the environment and seek the attachment figure in times of distress
    • feel confident that the attachment figure will be available to meet their needs
    • easily soothed when upset, infants develop a secure attachment when the caregiver is sensitive to their signals
    During Ainsworth's Study:
    • distressed when mother leaves the room but happy and comforted by her return
    Characteristics of Mother:
    • loving, responsive, supportive
    • 55-75%
  • Type C: Insecure Resistant
    Characteristics of Infants:
    • behaviour results from an inconsistent level of response to their needs from the primary caregiver
    • ambivalent children have negative self image and exaggerate their emotional responses as a way to gain attention
    During Ainsworth's Study:
    • Very distressed when mother leaves the room and not comforted by her returning
    • heightened anxiety before, during and after the test.
    • did not actively explore the room even when mother was present
    Characterisitics of Mother:
    • non-affectionate, unresponsive
    • 7-12%
  • aim of the study: to observe attachment security in infants
  • The method used in the study:
    Participants:
    • 100, 12-18 month year old children and their mothers
    Materials:
    • a chair and toys for children to play with
    Design:
    • IV- mother and stranger entering and leaving the room
    • DV- observed behaviour of the children
  • Procedure:
    1. mother and baby in room with toys and she interacts with the baby while it plays (3 minutes)
    2. . A stranger joins the mother and baby
    3. Mother leaves the room (quietly/discretely) baby is alone with stranger (approximately 3 minutes)
    4. 1st reunion -Mother returns to the room, stranger leaves
    5. Mother stays in the room while the baby plays or requires comfort.
    6. Mother leaves and infant is left alone with the toys (3 minutes unless distressed)
    7. The stranger returns and plays with the baby.
    8. 2nd reunion - Mother returns and stranger leaves.
  • Type A: Insecure Avoidant
    Proximity: doesn’t seek proximity with mother
    Exploration: infant is happy to explore, but doesn’t use mother as secure base
    Stranger: shows very little anxiety
    Separation: shows no sign of distress when mother leaves
    Reunion: shows little interest when mother returns and may avoid contact
  • Type B: Secure Attachment
    Proximity: happy to seek proximity to mother
    Exploration: happy to explore and also use mother as secure base to explore from
    Stranger: moderate stranger anxiety
    Separation: moderate separation distress
    Reunion: happy and seeks comfort from mother
  • Type C: Insecure Resistant
    Proximity: seeks great proximity to the mother
    Exploration: explores very little, doesn’t use mother as a secure base
    Stranger: high levels of stranger anxiety
    Separation: high levels of separation distress
    Reunion: may approach mother, but resists comfort
  • Limitations:
    • children were cause a degree of psychological harm due to distress
    • only be valid in Western Europe and USA as was developed in these locations