Save
Psychology
Non-human animals
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Learn
Created by
Chloe Weymouth
Visit profile
Cards (24)
provides us with
info
we couldnt obtain with
humans
to
minimise
effects while conducting experiments,the british psychological society issue
guidelines
psychologists are advised to adhere current
legalisations
select suitable
species
consider
previous
experiences
ensure care beyond
study periods
caution with procedures causing
pain
and monitor
food intake
Follow the 3 Rs principle
replace
animal research
reduce
number
of
animals
refine
procedures
Skinner
using a rat,when they pressed a lever,they got food
positive reinforcement
can work and then can be
applied
to humans
Pavlov
experimented on
1000s
of dogs and they were starved,tortured and killed,not following the
BPS
guidelines
No
valid
consent
Animals are also used in therapy,the presence of
pets
has been founf to reduce
stress
levels
Animal
assisted therapy
employs animals such as dogs,cats,dolphins as behavioural
facilitators
Client can
bond
with animals through
activities
like grooming and feeding
The interaction creates a
social
bond,human is then able to transfer these skills to human
relationships
Friedmann and Son
28 studies using
AAT
and found positive effects on emotional problems such as
schizophrenia
Argued whether animals are
necassary
in therapy,the same as a
normal
client-therapist bond
Anestis
et al
critiqued
14
studies using AAT,most has a small smaple size,lack of
control
groups and non-random allocation to treatment groups
comparative
psychology involves studying animals and drawing
conclusions
to compare with humans
allows us to not study
humans
as their behaviour can be more
complicated
than animals
Harlow monkeys with
2
surrogate mothers,linked to
Bowlbys maternal deprivation hypothesis
Importance of the
mother
,how we connect with them is more important than
feeding
Ethological psychology,studying animals in their
natural
habitats to minimise
distrupting
Lorenz
gosling
eggs,inprinted on him
importance of the
mother-child
bond
Comparitive psychology has many
consequences
The
monkeys
in
Harlows
study struggled with emotional adjustment and faced difficulties socialising and caring for their own off-spring
When trying to compare humans and animals it doesnt always work due to their
differences
Monkeys struggles with
emotional
problems because they were taken out of their
natural environment
Lots of
ethical concern
for this type of psychology
Ethological psychology
is more ethical as animals stay within their own habitat ,reducing
demand characteristics
Using animals in psychology is avoidable,despite the
greatness
it has shown within the
field
Singer
argues there is such thing as
speciesism
,discriminating against aniamals based on their species but has adopted a
utiltarian
perspective
Regan
believes animals deserve to be
treated
right and with
respect
Animals dont have societal
responsibilities
so it can be argued they dont possess
rights