AS - Tectonics and Coasts

Cards (36)

  • Haiti Earthquake
    Year: 2010
    Plate Boundary: Conservative
    Plates: North American and Caribbean
    Epicentre: 25km SW of Port-au-Prince
    Richter Scale: 7.0
  • Why is Haiti susceptible to hazards?

    Multiple hazard zone
    Limited development of infrastructure
    Lack of health services
    Poor ability to cope
    Low resilience and recovery rate
  • Primary effects of Haiti
    • Ground Shaking
    • 70% buildings destroyed
    • 65km rupture
    • Communications lost
    • Road collapse
    • 4,000 amputees
  • Secondary effects of Haiti
    • Food, water and medicine shortages
    • 52 aftershocks
    • 230,000 dead
    • 500,000+ disease cases
    • 1.5 million homeless
  • Long term responses of Haiti
    • 20% jobs disappeared
    • Buildings were surveyed and colour tagged to meet stricter codes
    • Community projects (too few to make an impact)
    • 95% children returned to school
    • 810,000 ppl still in camps 1yr later
  • Sendai Earthquake

    Date: 11th March 2011
    Plate Boundary: Destructive
    Plates: Eurasian, Philippine, Pacific, Okhotsk
    Epicentre: 100km SE of Sendai
    Richter Scale: 9.0
  • Primary effects of Sendai

    • Ground Shaking
    • 25 million tonnes of debris
    • 144,300 buildings damaged
    • 45,700 destroyed
    • Communications lost
    • 1.5 million homes without water and electricity
    • Soil liquefaction - 400km vertical stretch
  • Secondary effects of Sendai
    • Tsunami (40m high)
    • 200,000+ ppl evacuated from Fuskushima nuclear plant
    • 15,000 dead
    • 6,000 injured
    • Disease
    • 452,000 in evacuation facilities
  • Immediate responses of Sendai
    • 452,000 ppl in temporary accommodation
    • JSDF - Japanese Self Defense Force. Search and rescue group that got there in 10 minutes
    • Japanese Red Cross opened aid funds within a couple hours
  • Long term responses of Sendai
    • GDP went down 5% (300 billion)
    • Fuskushima still contaminated with radiation
    • Banned exports due to radiation (rice, beef)
  • Iceland Volcano
    Year: 2010
    Plate Boundary: Constructive
    Plates: North American and Eurasian
  • Primary effects of Iceland
    • Glacial melting
    • 9m high plumes of volcanic ash
    • 15 lava fountains at 150m high
    • Volcanic gases - CO2, SO2, CO
    • Lava flows
    • Rapid pyroclastic flow
  • Secondary effects of Iceland
    • No deaths
    • Lahars
    • Glacial flooding
    • Mass evacuation
    • Poor air quality due to ash cloud
  • Immediate responses of Iceland
    • Aid
    • 100,000 flights cancelled in the following week affecting 7 million passengers
    • Camps set up
  • Swiss cheese model
  • Pressure and Release model (PAR)
  • Park‘s disaster curve
  • Risk poverty nexus
  • Hazard profiles
  • Degg's model
  • Earthquake waves
  • Geology of Holderness Coast
    • Mostly made from boulder clay but also fine clay, sand and boulders
    • Flamborough head made from hard chalk
    • Average rate of erosion: 2.26m
    • Differential rates of erosion give coastline distinctive shape
  • Fetch of Holderness Coast
    • Relatively small (500-800m)
    • Powerful, destructive waves from strong Atlantic currents
    • Intense storms
    • Relatively deep sea floor
    • Small drainage basin
  • Hornsea and Mappleton
    • Regional economic centre with 8500 ppl
    • Important historic sites and Hornsea Mere (SSSI)
    • Hold the line policy
    • 1990’s: had 2 rock groynes, rip-rap and cliff regrading.
    • No active intervention - 400m of land could be lost to erosion by 2105
    • By 2105, a small village of 50 properties could be cut off from a minor road west of the village making it a high risk location.
  • Blackwater Estuary, Essex

    • Tidal salt marsh and low lying farmland
    • Coastal defences aren’t sustainable due to coastal squeeze. Managed retreat has occurred (area allowed to be flooded)
    • 2000: Essex wildlife trust purchased Abbots Hall Farm on Blackwater Estuary. 4000 hectare scheme implemented to allow new salt marshes to form
    • PRO: High costs of hold the line avoided
    • PRO: Reduced flood risk
    • PRO: Additional income from ecotourism and wildfire watching
    • Shows that all stakeholders can be happy even when radical plans are adopted
  • Flooding in Australia
    Population: 25.7 million
    • Most ppl and infrastructure is on the coastline
    • $67 billion road and rail risk
    • $72 billion homes at risk
    • $226 billion worth of infrastructure at risk at a sea level rise of 1.1 metres
  • Flooding in Philippines
    Population: 114 million
    • $6.5 billion a year predicted damages due to sea level rise
    • Rate of sea level rise 5.8mm over annual average
    • High poverty and economically vulnerable
    • Damage to mangroves, corals and seagrass have reduced the ability to protect from flooding
  • Maldives
    Population: 400,000
    • Low lying islands with average ground elevation 1.5m above sea level
    • Currently use sandbags as defences but sea level rise is increasing
    • Flooding would cause jobs to disappear causing migration to other countries
    • Other countries aren’t willing to accept so many people
  • Coastlines
  • Longshore drift
  • Rockfall
  • Slide
  • Rotational Slumping
  • Mudflow
  • Constructive waves
  • Destructive waves