endurance (chooses to remain in presence of phobic stimulus fear to leave)
emotional symptoms
anxiety
fear
cognitive symptoms
selective attention to phobic stimulus
irrational beliefs
cognitive distortions (inaccurate perception)
behavioural approach
Mowrer proposed two process model 1960 - phobias are acquired by classical conditioning and continued by operant conditioning
Watson and Rayner created phobia in 'Little Albert' - white rat conditioned stimulus to produce conditioned response of fear/anxiety after being paired with loud bang unconditioned response
generalisation - conditioning to similar objects other fluffy objections non-white rat, fur coat, santa claus beard -> anxiety
Systematic desensitisation - gradually reduces phobic fear through classical conditioning - learning how to relax in presence of phobic stimulus (counter conditioning - reconditioning learning how to respond differently) -> reciprocal inhibition (impossible to be anxious and relaxed at same time)
anxietyhierarchy - list of situations in order of least to most scary
exposure - when they reach top of hierarchy and they can stay relaxed treatment is successful
strengths of systematic desensitisation
+ preferred over flooding - Schumacher et al participants and therapists rated systematic desensitisation as less stressful - ethical issues with traumatic natures + dropout rates for flooding higher - if people dropout not effective at all
+ supporting evidence - Gilroy et al systematic desensitisation for arachnophobia less fearful than control group - effective
weakness of systematic desensitisation
-more time consuming - many sessions + duration of sessions for gradual progress of hierarchy long themselves whereas flooding can even be just one long session - disruptive in life/not enough time with work/school - less convenient
treatment
flooding - no gradual buildup/immediate exposure
sessions are longer than SD 2-3 hours - sometimes only one long session required
classical conditioning - extinction (learnt response is extinguished when conditioned stimulus is encountered without conditioned response
strengths of flooding
+ time/cost effective - can be done in one long session rather than 10 sessions for SD to achieve same result - more people can be treated - more effective
weaknesses of flooding
-traumatic for patient - intense nature more likely to increase a phobia than SD doesn't wait for patient to be ready - if it makes phobia worse than not effective at all
-SD is preferred - Schumacher et al participants and therapists rated systematic desensitisation as less stressful - ethical issues with traumatic natures + dropout rates for flooding higher - if people dropout not effective at all