Gender - social construct which is perpetuated by the socialisation process
Folk linguistics - preconceived ideas of gender which have no evidence to back them up and are often based on stereotypes
Tape recorders have helped to make modern research more evidence based
Deficit Model - Lakoff
Women's speech reflects their inferiority compared to men's superior speech
Found women use features including tag questions, hedges, weak expletives (e.g. oh dear), empty adjectives (e.g. sweet), intensifiers (e.g. I like him so much) and euphemisms
Women are forbidden to display anger or express serious opinions which reinforces male power - certain language associated with women can be seen to damage male reputation
Their language shows women's lack of assertiveness and authority
Ideas based on folk linguistics/social constructions
Criticisms of Lakoff's ideas
Holmes - disagrees as she sees the proposed features of women's language as showing solidarity, a variety in language, politeness and genuine care
O'Barr and Atkins (courtroom) - study showed both genders could use powerless language as it depends on the context and sociolinguistic factors (e.g. class and status)
Unreliable study - the climate of Lakoff's research was male dominated, based on stereotypes, didn't account for other variables and had a limited corpus
Dominance Model
Zimmerman and West - suggest that the female sex is subordinate and that men are more dominant in male-female conversation. Women have restricted linguistic freedom as men impose their status through constraints. Found 96% of interruptions were made by men.
Dale Spender - criticises Lakoff's idea of women's language lacking assertion as English is a 'man-made' language - the patriarchy dictates the way women speak (e.g. generic man)
Difference Model
Tannen - differentiates men and women as belonging to different 'sub-cultures' as they have been told to do so since childhood. Men use a 'report style' of speaking which communicates facts and information. Men are concerned about independence and status so interrupt more. Women use a 'rapport style' of speaking to build relationships through compromise and show understanding and support rather than giving a solution
Tannen sees this as a strength - e.g. tag questions can build a rapport
Criticisms of Tannen's ideas
She didn't address power and some assertions were not based on sufficientevidence
Cameron - rejects the difference model - e.g. in sexual assault cases as by that logic men couldn't understand women who cannot express themselves clearly
Diversity Model
Suggests our biological sexdoes not make a difference to the language we use, instead our language is influenced by the roles we have in society and they way we interact with others
Denounces the concept of men and women speaking inherently differently
Argues this is a myth due to women being better at communication because they care about it and men having the different goal of wanting to be competitive
Argues gender is a social construct as masculine and feminine roles are not biologically fixed but as a result of gender performativity as performing their gender rituals so frequently has ingrained it into their psyche
Lavender Linguistics - coined by William Leap to refer to the study of language used by the LGBTQ+ community
Heteronormativity - belief that is normal/the standard to be heterosexual - e.g. a gay couple should feature a 'masculine' partner and a 'feminine' partner
Communities of Practice
Most researchers agree it is better to examine inter-speaker differences and who is connected to who in a community rather than studying speakers in isolation - e.g. sports clubs, book clubs and parenting groups
Podesva and Kulik - argue you cannot tell someone's sexuality because of their language
Paul Baker - speech of gay people uses features like puns and acronymswhich only make sense to those in the community - links to Fairclough's members resources