female terms in lexical pairs of words like mistress / master or spinster / bachelor have more negative connotations
identifying this as semantic asymmetry
Diminutive suffixes
Suffixes are added to the male term to create the female alternative:
Waiter – waitress
Actor – actress
male term typically connotes more power
Lexical priming
MichaelHoey2005
words and phrases have an undercoat layer of meaning, built from habitual usages in the same contexts
e.g mistress and master
Forms of address
gender marking seen in names and titles - patronyms - names that reflect male lines of inheritance e.g 'son'
some societies like Nordic can use matronyms
'Ms' - not denoting marital status - adopting ways to create equivalent to 'Mr' - new stigma of being widowed, divorced etc - still not equal and not widely used
Informal terms of address
binary terms of address for women and men
cupcake, sugar, honey, sunshine vs mate, pal, mister
girls referred to as food and sweet/innocent connotations - reflecting societies expectations and representations of women
Sapir-Whorf hypothesis
language determinism - language constructs our view of the world and it is difficult to think beyond it
language reflectionism - language reflects the society that produces it - until society becomes truly equal, representation of marginalised groups with pejorate
Euphemism treadmill
StevenPinker2003
the process in which words/phrases used to describe stigmatised groups or ideals pejorate and become socially unacceptable - becoming replaced by new ones
the cycle repeats - forming a treadmill of language terms
links to linguistic reflectionism - society unequal thus language is too
Semantic reclamation
change from below
process of taking language with negative connotations and trying to overturn them by using the language in new ways
more successful with affordance of social media
n word by black community - solidarity
Folk linguistics
claims made on perceptions and anecdotes rather than based on quantitative data
Main theories of language and gender
Deficit
Dominance
Difference
Diversity / socialconstructionist
Deficit theory
The notion that women’s speech is deficient in comparison to men’s
Deficit theorists
Otto Jesperson
Robin Lakoff
Otto Jesperson 1920s
adult male language is the standard and women's is deficit
women don't think before speaking - lack of full sentences
smaller vocabulary
prefer hidden meanings
women shrink from strong and coarse expressions
Otto Jesperson criticisms
largely out-dated - pejorative comments based on patriarchy
folk linguistics
based work largely on fictional literature
Robin Lakoff 1973
male = norm, women deviate away from it
language use contributes to lower societal status
hedging e.g 'maybe' or 'sort of'
tag questions
apologise more
speak less frequently
Candace West 1990
study of mitigation - language used by men and women in doctor patient scenarios
men favoured use of aggravated imperatives 'take this' whereas women favoured mitigated imperative 'lets try' as well as inclusive pronoun and tag questions
patients with female doctors 17% more compliant
challenges Lakoff's idea of female weak language as a sign of less confidence but instead holding more emotional intelligence
Robin Lakoff criticisms
lacks stringent methodology
based off own social group - Californian middle class white
founded upon heteronormative assumptions and a binary model
Dominance theory
Lang is male-centred because females are seen as subordinate group whose difference in style of speech results from male supremacy and also possibly an effect of patriarchy.
Males dominate society which is reflected in public and private conversations.
Dominance theorists
Zimmerman and West
Pamela Fishman
Zimmerman and West 1975
recordings were white, middle class under 35
men are more likely to interrupt that women over a series of 11 conversation - 46 male and 2 women
Zimmerman and West criticisms
Small sample
One particularly voluble male could heavily skew results - - Not wholly reliable
Geoffrey Beattie (1982) - recorded 10 hours of tutorial discussion and found no significant differences - concluded that one very voluble man in could have a disproportionate effect on results.
Interruptions can be interest enthusiasm or involvement in a conversation - context must be taken into account.
Pamela Fishman
52 hours of convos between young American couples - white, well-educated age 25-35
intersex conversation often fails as men don't respond
men speak on average twice as long as women
men control the topic
women do the "conversational shitwork" - ask questions to elicit a response, men in their dominant role do not need to keep conversation up
male dominance reflected in conversation
both deficit and dominance models focus upon gender as the defining principle of language use
Difference theory
an approach of equality
differentiating men and women as belonging to different 'sub-cultures‘ with different communicative styles
Difference theorists
Deborah Tannen
John Locke
Jane Pilklington
Deborah Tannen
not better or worse - just different
male and female cultures with own rules and meanings
men use a 'report style' to communicate factual info and women use more of a 'rapport style' to build and maintain relationships
based on anecdotal evidence
Tannen's categories of language use
Status vs Support - men build status, women seek support
Information vs feelings - information orientates vs building relationships
orders vs proposals - men use direct imperatives and women use hidden imperatives and super polite forms
John Locke 2011 - Duels vs Duets
evolutionary position of men as competitive beings - men engage in 'duelling' for status
women sounds more like a verbal 'duet' - harmonious way of achieving goals by sharing intimate thoughts and feelings
linguistic sub-cultures - difference in socialisation leads to internalisation of different gendered cultural norms, reflected in language use
Jane Pilkington
bakery over a period of nine months
women talk to affirm solidarity and maintain social relationships - focus on feelings
women agree frequently
men frequently disagree and challenge each other's points - competitive and take part in verbalsparring
men are less complimentary
in a bakery - context missing such as region, family owned.
Diversity/social constructionist theory
Gender alone is not the reason for language differences, but also a variety of extraneous variables:
there can be as many differences between two women as between a man and a woman.
less binary
diversity theorists
Judith Butler
O'barr and Atkins
Deborah Cameron
Unni Berland
Judith Butler - gender trouble
Gender is not biological/innate, but culturally constructed.
Gender is performative - performance of what is seen to be appropriate gendered behaviour creates gender.
explores way in which we troublegender when we do anything out of the ordinary in terms of language use.
gender is a social construct - fluid and dynamic which changes with context
O'Barr and Atkins
testing Lakoff's assumptions
typically female features like hedging and tag questions were viewed as weak - but were used by lower class males and less by middle, class high status women
features linked to lack of power and social class - 'powerless language' rather than gendered
may explain why is it typically associated with female language through deficit model - but accepts intersectionality
Unni Berland
study of teenager's use of conversational tags 'innit' , 'yeah' and 'right' (discourse markers to convey agreement)- very little difference between genders
social class more influencing factor - innit more common amongst working class and yeah by middle class
may also hold aspects of regional variation
Deborah Cameron
Verbal hygiene” describes the tendency humans have to “clean up” or monitor our language
set standards to talk in terms of what is “correct” and “incorrect” - teach grammar in schools
sit in judgement on other people’s language
define what is politically correct
in most cultures - we impose expectations of how women, in particular should speak and to instruct them - men less overtly
linguistic identity is unstable and that speakers continually reshape that language identity depending on a whole host of variables.
a difference in how the connection between language and gender identity is understood - language is now seen as constructing gender and identity - as individuals, we may have multiple language identities
the more compelling view of language use, in a modern context is ....
the statement focuses, exclusively, upon the impact of...