argues rising crime rate can't solely be explained by crime statistics but are less critical of them
focus on individuals and disadvantaged groups who are at greater risk of being a victim
3 causes of crime
cause - relative deprivation
how deprived someone feels in relation to others + their expectations
leads to crime when people resent others for having more and resort to crime to obtain what they want
people are now better off but more aware of relative deprivation because of media and advertising
cause - subcultures
a groups collective response to being relatively deprived
accept values of wealth etc but legitimate opportunities are blocked so they resort to street crime
cause - marginalisation
process where certain groups find themselves on the edge of society e.g young black men face marginalisation through prejudice such as militant policing
express frustration through criminal means e.g riots because they're powerless in society
cause - the policing problem
police clear up rates are too low, suggest they're loosing public support (proof blm protests)
they often resort to militant policing e.g stop and search as a method of solving crime
alienates the community from them and the public loose trust
creates a vicious cycle where the public no longer give police vital information
solution - tackling structural causes
main solution
deal with inequality of opportunities
tackle discrimination
provide decent jobs, homes and community facilities
solution - government policy
left realists have had influence on gov policy, views are similar to new labour "tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime" stance
new labours firmer approach to policing hate crimes and sexual assaults reflects left realist concern to protect vulnerable groups from crime
evaluation
focuses on victims as well as offenders
interactionists : criticise the use of victim surveys, doesn't explain motives
marxists : doesn't explain corporate crime as ruling class don't experience relative deprivation or marginalisation