Any behaviour that deviates from social and statistical norms, that is maladaptive and causes personal distress
Psychological or mental disorder
A psychological dysfunction within an individual that is associated with distress or impairment in functioning and a response to this deviates from the person's culture
Criteria for a mental disorder
Statistical deviance
Maladaptiveness
Personal distress
Statistical deviance
Making use of statistical norms of behaviour and experience to determine what is normal. Anything that falls far from the norm would be considered abnormal.
Maladaptiveness
Focus on the degree to which certain behaviours or experiences are maladaptive to the self or others. Behaviours that prevent the individual from adjusting or adapting for the good of the individual or the group are defined as abnormal.
Personal distress
Psychological disorders are accompanied by distress and suffering. However, distress is not sufficient alone to define abnormality and it does not always imply abnormality because all people at some point in their lives experience distress.
Classifications of mental disorders
International Classification of Diseases (ICD)
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5)
ICD
Produced and published by the WHO, includes a section on mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders, aimed at primary care practitioners and used worldwide
DSM-5
Produced and published by the APA, focuses on mental disorders and clinically useful categories and criteria to optimise healthcare and health statistics, provides a means for the profession to communicate about clinically recognisable conditions, facilitates objective assessment of symptoms, outlines prognosis and causes, and provides a structured way to diagnose mental disorders
The borders between DSM diagnostic categories and normality can be fuzzy and particular diagnostic entities can often be specified by numerous possible conditions and symptoms which means that some of the symptoms overlap with each other causing patients to be diagnosed with a number of disorders
DSM-5 focus on diagnostic validity and the ICD focus on clinical utility
Constructs remain fuzzy and complex, with fuzziness emerging at the borders between different disorders and between normality and psychopathology, remaining a matter of clinical judgement rather than easily resolved diagnostic biomarkers
Important and widely used diagnoses are heterogeneous and may ultimately turn out to represent multiple conditions, with genome wide association studies indicating overlap in genetic risk factors consistent with complexity and multiple genes contributing to the risk of any mental disorder
Dimensional model
Recognises that mental disorders lie on a continuum ranging from disturbed to normal behaviour and that mental disorders may evolve overtime through various stages of the disorder, so a patient would be identified in terms of their position on a specific dimension of cognitive or affective capacity, rather than being placed in a categorical box
Holistic model
Considers pharmacological treatments and social and spiritual treatments on a similar level, recognising the biopsychosocial underpinnings of disorders and the role and context in which the symptoms are experienced, targeting these in an integrated way
John Hopkins model (perspectival model)
Different mental disorders have different natures, and identifies four perspectives that can be used to identify the distinctive characteristics of mental disorders: disease, dimensions, behaviours, and life story
Reliability
The degree to which a measurement is consistent, that is two or more assessors will get the same results when using the same assessment tool, and how stable the results of the assessment are over time
Validity
The degree to which the tool or technique assesses or measures what is supposed to assess
Standardisation
The process of determining specific norms and requirements for an assessment technique to make certain that it is used in a consistent manner across assessment situations
Basic steps in the diagnostic process
1. Ask the patient what is wrong to establish the presenting problem
2. Focus on observable signs during the interview
3. Rule out medical conditions that could explain the problem
4. Perform a neurological examination
5. Conduct a mental status examination
6. Make a firm diagnosis through a process of identification and elimination
Clinical interview
Allows the diagnostician to obtain a detailed description of the presenting problem, detailed history of the patient's life, information about attitudes, emotions and behaviour, family history, and when the problem started
Mental Status Examination (MSE)
A systematic observation of the patient's behaviour, encompassing appearance and behaviour, thought processes, mood and affect, intellectual functioning, and sensorium
Behavioural assessment
Makes use of direct observation in order to assess formally an individual's thoughts, feelings and behaviours in a specific context, focusing on what happened before the behaviour, the behaviour itself, and the consequences
Core ethical values and standards
Respect for persons
Best interests or well-being (non-maleficence)
Best interests or well-being (beneficence)
Human rights
Autonomy
Integrity
Truthfulness
Confidentiality
Compassion
Tolerance
Justice
Professional competence and self-improvement
Community
Challenges to ethical behaviour include professional disrespect, confidentiality and forensic reports, inappropriate relationships with clients, selection assessment, fees, advertising, and competence
Aetiology
The study of the cause of disorders, which guides the clinician in understanding a patient's symptoms and making decisions regarding treatment, but does not provide direct answers because human behaviour is highly complex and disorders are often multi-factorial
Psychologist should charge a patient
Strictly according to the actual duration of the therapy session and according to the agreed fees
Advertising for professional services
There are strict guidelines
Competence of professionals
They should be careful not to act outside their level of competence as this may lead to harm to the client
Self-assessments on pg. 75-76; 96-97; 157-158
Aetiological models
Aetiology
The study of the cause of disorders
Understanding aetiology guides the clinician in understanding a patient's symptoms and making decisions regarding treatment
Aetiology does not provide us with direct answers about the causes of disorders because:
Human behaviours is highly complex
Disorders are more often than not caused by multiple factors
Casual factors change over the lifespan
Different casual routes exist for the same disorder
The same casual route may develop into different disorders
Reasons why the study of aetiology of disorders is important:
Treatment and management of disorders is often informed by the aetiology of the disorder
A better understanding of the aetiology can also inform categorisation and classification of disorders
Studies of aetiology stimulates further research
Equifinality
When sets of different circumstances lead to the same disorder
Multifinality
When sets of similar beginnings lead to different disorders
Biomedical perspectives
This model claims that all mental illnesses have a biological cause
Biological abnormalities understood to occur in four different areas