early attachments and later relationships

    Cards (18)

    • Internal working model
      According to Bowlby, the attachment a child has with its primary caregiver provides the infant with a schema and template for future relationships
    • The continuity hypothesis
      Future relationships will follow the pattern based on childhood attachment, impacting childhood relationships, adult relationships and relationships with one's own children
    • Secure attachment
      • When a child has a secure loving relationship with their primary caregiver, they will assume all relationships should be like that and will seek out functional relationships and be functional within these relationships
    • Insecure-avoidant
      • Emotionally closed and/or uninvolved in their relationships, making it difficult to form secure attachments
    • Insecure-resistant
      • Controlling and argumentative in their relationships, making it difficult to form secure attachments
    • Hazan and Shaver (1987) conducted a 'love quiz' study, they asked people to respond to a love quiz in the newspaper, the quiz examined feelings in a romantic relationship
    • Attachment types found in the study
      • Secure: Balanced (equally and when relevant) between closeness and independence
      • Avoidant: Avoiding closeness
      • Anxious: Clingy, does not cope with their own independence
    • Securely attached adults

      Believe in long-lasting love and were less likely to get divorced
    • Insecure types

      Were more likely to report loneliness
    • McCarthy (1999) studied 40 adult women who had been assessed as children in their early attachment types
    • Those who had been assessed as securely attached as infants

      Had the most secure and 'best' adult friendships and relationships
    • Those who had been assessed as insecure and resistant as infants
      Struggled to maintain friendships
    • Those who had been assessed as insecure-avoidant
      Struggled with intimate relationships
    • Insecure-avoidant children
      Were more likely to be bullied
    • Insecure resistant children

      Were more likely to be bullies
    • Children with secure attachments
      Have a positive Internal Working Model and so have a healthy outlook on relationships helping them stay away from bullies and bullying
    • Strengths of the internal working model
      • It has a practical real-life application
      • Understanding why a child or adult may be struggling due to their attachment type allows those working with them, to support them better
      • This may help those who were not securely attached, reach relationship stability as they grow older
    • Limitations of the internal working model
      • Self-report techniques, which were used, can be less valid as participants may under or over-exaggerate
      • There may also be bias in the type of person who replies to adverts in newspapers: e.g. people who had recently suffered a bad break-up and wished to vent their feelings
      • It is difficult to establish a cause and effect as it is a correlation: further research would be required