McLintock et al.'s longitudinal field study in which the menstrual cycles of women became synchronised after being exposed to a 'donor' pheromone which acted as an exogenous zeitgeber
Dement and Kleitman's research in which participants in a sleep lab were attached to an EEG monitor which showed that REM sleep was correlated with dreaming
There may be ethical considerations involved in conducting research on infradian rhythms as seen in McLintock et al.'s study (1998): deliberately disturbing a woman's natural menstrual cycle could have far-reaching effects
Morgan removed the SCN of hamsters and found that their sleep-wake cycle disappeared but then re-appeared once fetal hamster SCN cells had been transplanted into their brains
Campbell and Murphy demonstrated that light (in the form of a torch) is a key exogenous zeitgeber, even when shone on the back of participants' knees, as it disrupted their sleep cycles by up to three hours
The use of animals in research (see Morgan, 1995 above) could be argued to be unethical if the procedures involved cause physical and/or mental harm to the animal
Campbell and Murphy's (1998) study had a small sample size of 15 which is too small to be able to generalise from, meaning that the results lack external validity
Some people are able to (and may frequently) fall asleep in bright light, during daylight hours, etc. which means that light may not be as important to the sleep-wake cycle as some researchers suggest
It may be overly reductionist to focus on a narrow range of explanations when considering something as complex and variable as the patterns and habits involved in the sleep-wake cycle