Sexual selection can lead males to extreme efforts to demonstrate their fitness to females, producing sexual dimorphism in secondary sexual characteristics
This is caused by a positive feedback mechanism known as a Fisherian runaway, where the passing-on of the desire for a trait in one sex is as important as having the trait in the other sex
Desire of a trait is as important as the trait itself
If females choose attractive males, they will tend to get attractive sons, and, thus more grandchildren, because other choosy females will prefer their attractive, sexy sons
Theory functions regardless of the trait a female chooses, as long as it is heritable (trait varies between individuals of the population)
Possessing the trait that makes males attractive is more important than the qualities of the trait
Once a preference becomes established, females choosing males with elaborate secondary sexual traits will produce sons that carry alleles for the trait
Those males will produce daughters that carry alleles for the preference
This generate genetic coupling that will drive self-reinforcing coevolution of both trait and preference
Positive feedback due to the mating advantage of males with the trait creates a Fisherian runaway sexy sons process
Since Fisher's initial 'runaway' concept, other researchers have mathematically defined the circumstances under which runaway sexual selection can take place
Andersson's definition: "sexual selection is the differences in reproduction that arise from variation among individuals in traits that affect success in competition over mates and fertilizations"
The handicap principle: a male's survival to a reproduction age with seemingly maladaptive traits (e.g., ornamentation) is taken by the female as a signal of his overall fitness
Indicator of his disease resistance, greater speed, and physical strength
It suggests that costly signals must be reliable signals
Controversial and not universally embraced, but influential
Sexual size dimorphism can vary in direction and magnitude across populations
Traits such as territorial defence (a predictor of sexual selection for large male size) and clutch size (a predictor of fecundity selection for large female size) are associated with evolutionary shifts in sexual size dimorphism
Prof Matt Gage, University of East Anglia: '"Sexual selection was Darwin's second great idea, explaining the evolution of a fascinating array of sights, sounds and smells that help in the struggle to reproduce - sometimes at the expense of survival"'
Mechanisms of competition for mates and traits likely favoured
Same-sex contests: Traits improving success in confrontation (large body size, strength, weapons, threats); avoidance of contests with superior rivals
Mate preference by opposite sex: Attractive/stimulatory features; offerings of food, territory, and other resources that improve mate's reproductive success
Scrambles: Early search and rapid location of mates; well-developed sensory and locomotory organs
Endurance rivalry: Ability to remain reproductively active during much of season
Sperm competition: Ability to displace rival sperm; production of abundant sperm; mate guarding or other ways of preventing rivals from copulating with mate
Resource defense polygyny: females are attracted to a resource — males then compete to possess resource, and, by extension, mating priority with females