Where both parties have done what they have agreed in the contract
What is discharge by breach?
This is where the contract has not been performed as agreed
What is discharge by frustration?
This is where unforeseen events outside the control of the parties make performance impossible
What is the general rule of discharge by performance?
Discharge by performance can only be done if the performance was complete and exact
What case links to discharge by performance?
Cutter v Powell
What are the ways around the harsh rule?
Divisible contracts
Substantial performance
Prevention of full performance
Acceptance of part performance
What are divisible contracts?
Where a contract can be split up into separate parts, if there is non-completion of one part of the contract then this will bit be seen as a breach of the whole contract
What case links to divisible contracts?
Ritchie v Atkinson
What is substantial performance?
The payment of the amount appropriate to what has been done can be paid for the performance that was given
What case links to substantial performance?
Dakin and co v Lee
What is the problem with the doctrine of substantial performance?
There are no specific percentages as to what amounts to substantial performance
What is prevention of full performance?
If one party prevents the other from carrying out the contract then the innocent party can claim to be paid on a ‘as much as it is worth’ basis
What case links to prevention of full performance?
Planche v Colburn
What is acceptance of part-performance?
If one party has agreed that the other party need not complete the entire contract then the contract must be paid on as much as it’s worth basis
must be done with consent
What case links to acceptance of part-payment?
Sumpter v Hedges
What is a time term?
The parties have expressly stated in the contract that time is of the essence of the contract
in the circumstances the time for completion of the contract is critical
One party has failed to perform on time and the other has insisted on a new date for completion of the contract
What case links to time terms?
Charles Rickards Ltd v Oppenheim
What does section 52 say about the time for performance?
If the contract does not expressly fix a time for the service to be performed and does not say how it is to be fixed then the contract is to be treated as including a term that the trader must perform the service within a reasonable time
What is an actual breach?
Where the breach occurs at the time or during the course of performance
What is anticipatory breach?
This is when a party to a contract gives notice in advance to the other party that they will not be performing or completing the contract
What circumstances give rise to a breach of Contract?
Renunciation of a party of their liabilities under the contract
Impossibility created by their own act
Total or partial failure of performance
What is a repudiatory breach of contract?
Where a party commits a breach of contract that is sufficiently serious that is entitled the innocent party to treat the contract as terminated
What ways can repudiatory breaches occur?
A breach of a condition
A refusal to perform the contract
A sufficiently serious breach of an innominate term
What case links to anticipatory breach?
Hochester v de la tour
What are the remedies of discharge by breach?
Damages and repudiation
What is discharge by frustration?
If a party to a contract was prevented from keeping their promise because of an unforeseeable intervening event then they are not liable for a breach of contract
What case links to discharge by frustration?
Taylor v Caldwell
When will the law on frustration apply?
It is now impossible for performance to be completed
The contract has now become illegal to perform
The contract has become fundamentally different
What case links to impossibility of performance?
Robinson v Davidson
What is meant by The contract becoming illegal to perform?
If there is a change in the law, that now makes performance illegal this could mean that the contract has been frustrated
What is meant by the contract has become fundamentally different?
If the main purpose of the contract is based on a particular event, and that event will now not take place, the contract may be frustrated
What case links to the contract becoming fundamentally different?
Krell v Henry
When will the rules of frustration not apply?
Self-induced frustration
The contract becoming less profitable
The event being a foreseeable risk of the event was mentioned in the contract
What case links to self-induced frustration?
Maritime National Fish Ltd
What case links to The contract becoming less profitable?