natural moral law is act centred and the key thinker is aquinas who focuses on summa theological which is the innate rule that good is to be done and evil avoided
aquinas highlights the 5 primary precepts that are certain and then from those come secondary precepts which are more flexible
primary precepts in natural law include = reproduction, living in an ordered society, preservation of innocent life, worship god and educate children
secondary precepts that can be derived include = no contraception, no abortions, not stealing etc
natural law highlights two types of virtues
cardinal = can be achieved by humans = justice, courage, temperance (self control) and prudence (cautious)
theological = given to humans by gods grace = love, hope and faith
aquinas also differentiates between certain acts/goods
real good = donating to charity
apparent good = adultery = short term pleasure long term pain
interior act = donating to help
exterior act = donating to charity to look good
natural law is part of the hierarchy of laws
eternal law = from god
divine law = revealed eg 10 commandments
natural moral law = human reason
human law = legal system
the doctrine of double effect in natural law considers proportions and intent and has 4 conditions = good act, means end, good intent, more good than bad
eg. saving mothers life but kills baby in process
what is proportionism in natural law = more liberal version eg. a starving man can steal
strengths of natural moral law
set rules in times of uncertainty
focuses on good
can be adapted more liberally eg. proportionalism
weaknesses
not flexible at all
can lead to immoral outcomes eg. homophobic
situation ethics is act centred and the key thinker is Jospeh fletcher who uses agaepic calculus to find what is most loving
situation ethics focuses on 4 working principles
pragmatism = practical
relevatism
personalism = people come before laws
positivism = what promotes the most love
situation ethics has 6 fundamental principles
love is the only norm
love only is always good
love and justice are the same
only the end justifies the means
love is not liking
love decides there and then
strengths of situation ethics
based on promoting agape
considers contact and can me adapted to modern
promotes individual autonomy
weaknesses
subjective view on most loving act
large responsibility on individual
atheists may reject idea
virtue ethics is agent centred and the key thinker is Aristotle who believes our Ergon (function) is to strive for eudaemonia = pleasure and happiness
virtue ethics also highlights the hierarchy of souls
plants - vegetative - nutrition and growth
animals - sensitive - nutrition and growth and movement
humans - rational - nutrition and growth and movement and reason
only voluntary actions can be virtuous as a virtue is a valued character trait
in virtue ethics the doctrine of the mean = golden mean = virtues lie between to extremes called vices = excess or deficiency = relative to the individual
two types of virtues in virtue ethics include
intelectual virtues like maths
moral virtues like courage
strengths of virtue ethics
holistic and considers multiple factors
teleological focus on eudaemonia and promoting good
agent centred and flexible
weaknesses
subjective to the individual
environment likely ignores and animals seen as lesser
outdated as Aristotle was a privileged male in greek times
natural moral law view on theft
goes against living in and ordered society and worshiping god, also goes against cardinal virtue of justice and secondary precept do not steal
doctrine of double effect allows if value overtakes disvalue
situation ethics view on theft
can only be answered in reference to scenarios
eg. stealing a book from the library = deprive other students = not loving
eg. stealing medication to save life
virtue ethics states that theft us a base act meaning it can't be dine well or not well = no way to be virtuous
in natural moral law lying violates the primary precepts of living in an ordered society and worshiping god. also violates the secondary precept not to lies
a lie can be allowed if it is necessary eg. a misleading truth like if a mad axeman is looking for your friend
in situation ethics there is no intrinsic right or wrong
eg. innocent girl going to marry syphalitic man = lying is unjust
eg. nurses lie to schizophrenic patients = allowed = pragmatic and follows agape
for virtue ethics lying is mostly wrong as it goes against the values of honesty and justice however if a mad axeman asks where your friend is then the virtues become balanced eg loyalty vs honesty, lying becomes virtuous
natural moral law strictly state no abortion as life begins from conception it goes against the sanctity of life and primary precepts of procreation and preserving innocent life
doctrine of double effect allows it to a certain extent = side effect of saving mums life
for situation ethics and abortion there are no intrinsic rights or wrongs as long as love is best served
eg. lady has had many abortions and wants another
eg. lady is going to have a defective baby = practical and most loving for child and mum
for virtue ethics abortions can be allowed before signs of an individual form (potentiality principle)
aborting baby to save money = callous and golden mean would be adoption
baby destined to be very sick = virtuous to abort as kind
natural moral law rejects any form of euthanasia as "worst evil is not pain but death itself"
it is apparent good = short help but no long term gratification
breaks primary precept of preserving life and worshipping god
situation ethics would allow euthanasia if it distributes the most love = personalism and pragmatism eg. Jim will die in 8 weeks but in pain - allow euthanasia
virtue ethics would allow euthanasia if it is the golden mean based on circumstance = if eudaemonia can't be achieved what is the point in living = however would enduring the pain show virtues of courage
natural moral law can allow capital punishment as the primary precept highlights preservation of innocent life and a criminal may disrupt ordered society
also divine law = an eye for an eye
legitimate as long as its done by a worker of the state and not an individual eg god let the Israelites kill their enemies
virtue ethics allow capital punishment if done for justice = virtuous
situation ethics decide on capital punishment based on what love demands
allow - love and justice are the same
not allow - love is not liking
natural moral law reject embryo research and cloning as it goes against the primary precept to worship god and goes agains gods image
designer babies go against an ordered society as may cause a class divide
situation ethics are not against embryo research but the good must outweigh the bad = designer babies for health reasons only and cloning for cheap labour is not allowed
in virtue ethics embryo research is based on reason = to cure disease and help wider society reach eudaemonia is allowed but to give It to science to save money = callous and cowardess
natural morally has little to no objection on blood sports as aquinas believes animals can be used as humans see fit eg dog fighting
it is more modernly believed that animals should be cared for as god created them
situation ethics rejects blood sports as we should extend agape to animals as it may degrade humans to other forms of violence
in virtue ethics blood sports is a greek past time so Aristotle approved
scuten argues some show virtues eg bull fighting show courage - inferior courage?