who are the 2 psychologists associated with this research?
Lorenz + Harlow
what did Lorenz do a study into?
Goslings + the way they imprint
what did harlow do a study into?
monkeys + the importance of contact comfort
procedure of lorenz : imprinting
randomly divided 12 goose eggs, half hatched with the mother goose in their natural environment and the other half hatched in an incubator where the first moving object they saw was lorenz
mixed all goslings together to see who they would follow
Lorenz also observed birds and their later courtship behaviour
findings + conclusions of lorenz : imprinting
incubator groups followed Lorenz, control group followed the mother
Loren identified a critical period in which imprinting needs to take place, e.g. few hours after hatching. if imprinting didn't occur within that time, chicks didn't attach themselves to the mother figure
sexual imprinting also occurs whereby the birds acquire a template of the desirable characteristics in a mate.
procedure of harlow : importance of contact comfort
reared 16 rhesus monkeys with two wire model mothers- (1) milk dispensed by the plain wire 'mother' (2) milk dispensed by the cloth-covered 'mothers'. monkey's preferences measured
further measure- reactions of monkeys to frightening situations observed, e.g. Harlow placed monkeys into novel situations with novel objects & also added a noise-making teddy to the environment
harlow & colleagues also continued to study the monkeys who had been deprived of their 'real' mother into adulthood.
findings & conclusions of Harlow: importance of contact comfort:
baby monkeys cuddled the soft object in preference to wire one regardless of which dispensed milk- suggests that contact comfort was of more importance than food when it came to attachment behaviour
monkeys sought comfort from cloth wire mother when frightened
as adults, the monkeys that were deprived of their real mothers suffered severe consequences- more aggressive, less sociable and less skilled in mating than other monkeys. they also neglected and sometimes killed their own offspring.
strength of Lorenz: support for concept of imprinting :
guiton found that chicks imprinted on yellow washing up gloves would try to mate with them as adults. this suggests that young animals are born with an innate mechanism to imprint on a moving object present in the critical window of development. this suggests there is an innate mechanism causing a young animal to imprint on a moving object during the critical period of development.
limitation of Lorenz :
guiton found that chickens imprinted on yellow washing-up gloves tried to mate with them as adults. but with experience they learned to mate with their own kind. this study suggests that the effects of imprinting are not as long-lasting as Lorenz believed.
strength of Harlow: important practical applications:
it has helped social workers understand risk factors in child abuse and so intervene to prevent it. we also now understand the importance of attachment figures for baby monkeys in zoos and breeding programmes in the wild. the usefulness of harlow's research increases its value.
ethical issues associated with harlow's research:
rhesus monkeys are similar enough to humans for us to generalise findings, which means their suffering was presumably human-like. Harlow himself was aware of the suffering caused. he referred to the wire mothers as 'iron maidens', named after a medieval torture device. the counter-argument is that harlow's research was sufficiently important enough to justify the procedures.
limitation of Harlow: generalising from monkeys to humans:
although monkeys are clearly more similar to humans than Lorenz's geese, they are not humans. for example, human babies develop speech-like communication ('babbling'). this may influence the formation of attachments. psychologists disagree on the extent to which studies of non-human primates can be generalised to humans.