Paper 3

Subdecks (3)

Cards (215)

  • Rights under CRA not always guaranteed protection s9

    Tests not always clear have to rely on reasonable and fairness
  • Protection too rigid strict rules go above levels of protection really needed may cause unfairness
    S11 re Moore co description must be lived up to helps inequality of bargaining power
    Holds high amounts of certainty
  • Some liabilities cannot be excluded s65 shows that liabilities for personal injury or death caused by negligence cannot be excluded

    S31 liability to implied rights of goods cannot be excluded

    Huge certainty over the rights and also protects the weaker party
    Goes against freedom of contract
  • Spice Girls
    Making a statement should be interpreted broadly to include everything in ng
  • Silence or non disclosure cannot amount to false statement
    1:Fletcher her silence not a false statement
    2: Lambert contracts with a high degree of trust
    Dimmock Half truths
    O’ Flanaghan change of circumstances
  • C must have known about the existence of a false statement 

    Horsefall
  • False statement must have materiallyaffected c,’s decision
    Atwood
  • Rescission Innocent
    S2(2) misrepresentation act could award damages if it were fairer
  • Fraudulent misrepresentation 

    East v Maurer claim loss of profit
  • Innocent misrepresentation s2(1)
    Leaf
  • Bisset
    Statement of opinion never statement of fact
  • Edgington
    Future intention will be statement of a fact
  • (Performance breach)
    Performance and breach
  • Cutter v Powell
    Contracts are performed if there are complete and exact
  • Contracts can be broken into parts such as divisible contracts 

    Ritchie v Atkinson
  • Hoenig
    Substantial performance
  • Mahadeva
    If work has major defects no substantial performance
  • Planche
    When one party prevents the other party from completing payment should be made for the work already done
  • Time of the essence

    Union eagle
  • Statutory Remedy
    Consumer Rights Act 2015
    Frustrated Contracts Act 1943
  • Mitigated Loss duty

    Thai Airways less damages to pay
  • Remoteness of Damages
    Hadley normal Special
    Normal losses isn't remote come naturally from the breach reasonably foreseeable

    Special losses caused or by particular circumstances if D knew the particular circumstances
  • Nominal Damages
    Where contract has been breached but there's no loss
    Charter v Sullivan
  • Reliance loss
    Anglia Television v Reed
  • Loss of amenity
    Farley v Skinner
  • White & Carter v McGregor
    Anticipatory breach because you don't have to mitigate loss
  • Equitable Remedies
    - Specific Performance = this remedy forces the defendant to carry out agreed obligations Beswick

    - Injunction = court order to prevent someone from doing something - mandatory (orders party to do it) and prohibitory (orders party to not do it)

    Page one Records v Britton injunctions cannot be used to enforce personal services
  • Victoria Laundry v Newman
    Special loss due to the government contract reasonable man wouldn't have known
  • The more important a representation is, the more likely it is to be a term
    Birch v Paramount Estates
  • Routledge v McKay

    Timing of the statement wasn't important enough
  • Lack of knowledge means less of a term

    Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams
  • More knowledge means more of a term

    Dick Bentley Productions Ltd v Harold Smith (Motors) Ltd
  • Where a party has signed an agreement, they are bound by it

    L'Estrange v Graucob (1934)
  • An exception to Graucob - Interfotoy
    Unusual and onerous terms may not be incorporated without specific attention drawn to them
  • Grogan
    If it's not a contractual document terms will not be incorporated
  • An oral statement is more binding than a written statement verbal assurance

    Curtis
  • Terms weren't clear enough so exclusion clause did not incorporate
    Chapelton
  • Parker v SE Railway
    Term was clear enough and was incorporated SE took reasonable steps to inform him
  • O'Brien
    Newspaper told readers very clearly were rules were
  • Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking
    Notice must be given before or at the time of contracting