physical title: changes in river characteristics from the longprofile of the river may beck
why is the physical title suitable?
clearly linked to physical geography, cross-sectional area increases downstream due to erosion
physical hypothesis: we expect that the cross profile will increase as we move downstream, the river channel will get wider and deeper
cross-sectional diagram for each of the 4 locations that shows width and depth - easy to compare and see how the channel changes from source to mouth
velocity increases from source to mouth: velocity is affected by how much water is in contact with the bed and banks, the small channel in the upper course of the river means there is more friction which means the velocity slows
bedload size decreases and becomes more rounded from source to mouth: this is due to erosion which results from the stones colliding with each other and against the river channel - removing the rough texture and reducing the size of the particles
river channel width bar charts are easy to compare however they don't show the river's depth
a better way to show river channel depth and width is a cross-sectional diagram for each location (easy to compare)
the stones were measured with a ruler, and assessed on how rounded they were using classes
bedload size should be plotted on a scattergraph to see if there is any correlation - should be a positive correlation (as the size of the bedrock increases, so does the angularity)
measuring channel width: tapemeasure from one side to the other
measuring channel depth: divided width into 10, take 10 good measurements with a ruler and hold to the bottom
measuring stream velocity: ball, timer and meter ruler (how long it takes for the ball to flow from one end to the other)
measuring bedload: use a ruler and estimate roundness
limitations of measuring channel width: only take one measurement per site
limitations of measuring channel depth: human error (could've been measured wrong)
limitations of measuring stream velocity: people stood upstream, human error, reaction times
limitations of measuring bedload: only measured 10 stones per location
how to improve measurements of channel width/depth: use a class average= more reliable data
how to improve data collected by measuring stream velocity: use a flow meter, class average
how to improve measuring bedload data: measure more stones at each site and take an average
why the river study location was suitable:
was accessible - could travel in school hours
safe to get to the river
safe to collect data from 4 different locations
justify one primary data collection method for the river study:
river width - shows it gets wider downstream
river depth - shows it gets deeper downstream
speed of water - shows it gets faster downstream
pebbles were measured to show they get smaller and rounder downstream