Minority Influence occurs when a small group of people or even an individual changes the attitudes, behaviours and beliefs of the majority
Minority influence is the opposite of conformity which involves an individual being influenced by the majority
Minority influence is likely to lead to internalisation i.e. both public and private behaviour and beliefs align
The factors which enhance the effectiveness of a minority include consistency, commitment and flexibility
Consistency
The minority has to be consistent in their views i.e. promoting a specific 'message' which does not fluctuate or change over time
Staying consistent to a message/stance/viewpoint/belief is a way of showing the majority that you are firm, resolute and strong in the face of possible criticism or outright hostility
Consistency may be one or both of the following:
Synchronic consistency: The minority presents a united front and share the same view/message
Diachronic consistency: The minority have been arguing for their view/message for some time
Consistency may produce a war of attrition i.e. the majority may begin to look seriously at the minority's stance, possibly admiring them for not veering from what they believe in - and gradually this can chip away the doubts and misgivings of most people
An example of consistency can be seen in climate change activists: the message is the same (i.e. the earth is dying) and, over time, more people are taking this seriously
Commitment
The minority has to show full commitment to their message and not be put off by naysayers and critics
Commitment is often demonstrated via direct (and indirect) action (which can be extreme in some cases e.g. burning animal-testing labs down)
Strong commitment - even when the minority are are openly mocked or vilified - may lead the majority to think that the minority clearly believe in their campaign i.e. the minority has a point (known as the augmentation principle)
An example of commitment is the martyrdom of Emily Davison, a suffragette who flung herself in front of the king's horse at the Epsom Derby to raise awareness of women's right to vote
Flexibility
The minority should be able to adapt their point of view and accept reasonable and valid counter opinions otherwise most people will be put off and may remain unsympathetic (this is where consistency should be modified)
The minority are in a difficult position (precisely because they are the minority) so they do not have the luxury of assuming that in time everyone will agree with them, hence the need for a flexible approach
Maintaining a rigid, inflexible stance could, ultimately, spell the end of any interest from the majority
The process of change
The three factors - consistency, commitment and flexibility - make people think about the minority cause
Over time, the increasing numbers who change from the majority to the minority, are the converted
The more this process happens, the faster the rate of conversion from majority to minority
The above process is called the snowball effect - what starts out small gathers pace and picks up new members, like a snowball being rolled downhill
Over time, the minority becomes the majority
Research which investigates minority influence
Nemeth (1986) Participants in the inflexible condition (who refused to consider anything other than a low rate of compensation for people injured in an accident) had little or no effect on the majority; however, in the flexible condition, the majority members were much more likely to also compromise and change their view
Evaluation of minority influence
Strengths
Research supports the idea of the consistent minority (Wood et. al's meta-analysis showed a strong effect size for consistency)
Real-world examples (as outlined above on this page) show that minority influence can and does happen, hence the theory has external validity
Evaluation of minority influence
Weaknesses
Moscovici's study asked participants to state the colour of a slide which is an artificial task which lacks mundane realism
Minority influence may in part be due to the personality of the people or main person associated with the group rather than with their cause e.g. charismatic cult leaders who persuade people to join their group