D may be convicted of causing grievous bodily harm with intent contrary to section18 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861.
Actus Reus - defined as 'really serious harm' (DPP v Smith) or 'serious harm' (Saunders)
Physical harm (Bollom)
Psychologicalmental injury (Burstow)
Biological injury (Dica)
It can also include multipleminor injuries (Brown & Stratton) and can take into account V's age (Bollom).
Causation
Factual - 'but for' test (White)
Legal - de minimis 'more than a minor cause' (Kimsey), operating and substantial cause 'most to blame' (Smith)
New Intervening Acts - v's own actions (Roberts), v's self neglect (Wallace/Holland), actions of a 3rd party (Pagett), palpably wrong medical treatment (Smith/Jordan), thin skull rule (Blaue)
Mens Rea
Intention - aim, wish or desire to cause GBH (Mohan) or that D had oblique intent in that GBH was a virtual certainty and D appreciated that (Woollin)
Sentence
Indictable offence
If both AR and MR are established, D would be guilty subject to any defence and if convicted, could face up to lifeimprisonment.