The belief that the behaviour is caused by environmental, genetic, unconscious impulses and other influences that determine people to act the way they do, therefore they are not responsible for their actions
Free will is unfalsifiable - cannot be tested in an experimental way (no causal relationship) and therefore invalid for psychological research and theory
Free will is intuitively correct - we know we can make choices and behaviour can be unpredictable, psychology really should incorporate this into research theory
Bradley Waldroup has MAOA gene that causes aggression. Not punished for his crime as not his fault but then released and hurt more people. Does determinism allow this to happen?
Interactionist stance - as best compromise in this debate that all psychology theories and research need to acknowledge humans use a mix of free will and pre-determined actions in their behaviour