kataphatic theology and language/the via positiva are about making positive statements about god, e.g. the christian creeds
for example, the statement that 'god is our Heavenly Father' can be used
the characteristics of a human father are not mirrored exactly in god but nevertheless can be meaningfully and usefully projected onto him.
apophatic theology and language/the via negativa is about making statements about god in terms of what he is not
god's total 'otherness' means that god cannot be referred to in terms that would be used of anything in the universe, including ourselves.
who developed the via negativa?
pseudo-dionysius
why did pseudo-dionysus develop the via negativa?
to emphasis god as completely beyond human understanding and to ensure that no language was used that could limit him.
PD said it cannot be said that god is good because humans do not know what this means.
PD says god is 'beyond assertion' and 'beyond denial'
PD claimed that god is nameless yet at the same time 'has the names of everything that is'. this expresses the idea of a god who is both immanent and omnipotent.
who supported the via negative?
maimonides
what did Maimonides say?
he was a jewish scholar who supported the via negativa
humans can known that god exists, but that is all
he believed that to use positive aspects such as power in reference to god was to limit and in fact reduce him
he therefore accumulated all the negatives that could be used. to illustrate this, he described the nature of a ship using only negative statements.
via negativa
the approach to religious language that describes god in terms of what he is not
apophatic language
the negative language used by the via negative approach
kataphatic language
the use of positive terms about god.
strengths:
it avoids making god a 'thing'
it avoids anthropomorphism, instead focusing on god's transcendence
it is true to the mystical experience of god as ineffable
weakness of the via negativa
most people want to say positive things about god. it is difficult for most people to worship a being referred to entirely in negatives
also the via negativa is vulnerable to the challenge made by flew in his 'parable of the gardener'
weakness of the via negativa
the end result of such language might not be the god of theism. Brian Davies showed maimonides' use of a bank of negatives to describe a ship might equally describe a wardrobe.
weakness of the via negativa
this language might be helpful to mystics, but for most people it is just too remote.
moreover, stating that one's experience cannot be described might suggest that the experience was a product of the mind.