types of experiments

    Cards (12)

    • Quantitative methods
      • use data that cen be counted
    • Qualitative methods
      • data that can be expressed in words and non-numerical
    • Experiments:
      • use quantitative data
      • look at a measureable change in the DV which has been caused by different levels of IV
      • All experiments have an IV and DV
    • Laboratory experiments
      • experiments conducted in a controlled environment
      • experimenter manipulates the IV and controls what happens
    • Strengths of Laboratory
      • EV's can be controlled
      • Researcher can be sure the IV casued the DV so this can establish a cause and effect
      • Standardised Procedures can be used so the study is easy to repeat to test validity of results
    • Weakness of Laboratory
      • Environment is not like everyday life due to artifical situation so it is difficult to generalise resluts to wider life because participant behaviour is less typical
      • Participants know they are being observed and tested so they change their behaviour to help the experimenter so may not act naturallydemand characteristics.
      • Data may not be valid
    • Field experiments
      • conducted in a real or natural setting
      • experimenter manipulates IV
    • Strength of field:
      • Often more realistic than lab experiments as participants not aware they are being studiedhigher validity.
      • Participants don’t often realise they are being studied so will act naturally.
      • some control over EV because standardised procedures can be used so cause and effect conclusions are more valid
    • Weakness of field:
      • Less control of extraneous variables (EV) because of real life setting so its more difficult to show cause and effect
      • There may be ethical issues – did participants give permission? May not know they are involved in experiment
      • Cannot give informed consent
    • Natural experiments:
      • in natural or laboratory setting
      • The occurs in real life situation in which IV varies naturally, so no manipulation is needed by the researcher.
    • Strengths of natural:
      • High validity as they involve real life changes- variables are naturally occuring but this isnt always the case
      • Generalisable to everyday situations
      • DV often tested in lab - EV can be well controlled because standardised procedures can be followed
    • Weakness of natural:
      • Few opportunites for this kind of research as it relies on natural events . Reduces usefulness of the methid
      • Events may be rare that the researcher is interested in so replication is almost impossible. i.e. 9/11 or bank robberies
      • No control of extraneous variables e.g unique characteristics can not be controlled because they cannmot be randomly allocated to groups