There's no single ruler over all countries, so they act in their own interests
Power politics
Countries use their strength and influence to get what they want
State of nature
A hypothetical idea of what life was like before governments existed
Nurture
The way you're raised and your environment shapes you
Utopian
Describing a perfect world that might not be possible
Harmony of interests
When everyone's interests align and work well together
Oppression
Controlling someone in a cruel or unfair way
State-centric
Focused on the interests of a particular country
Moral aspirations
High ideals about what is right and wrong
National interest
What a country believes is best for its own people
Cost-benefit analysis
Weighing the pros and cons of something before you do it
Security dilemma
When trying to be safe can actually make things more dangerous
Military capacity
A country's ability to fight a war
Self-determination
The right of a people to govern themselves
Bipolar
Having two main powerful countries
Multipolar
Having several powerful countries
Superpower rival
A country that is very powerful and competes with another powerful country
Nuclear arms race
When countries compete to build more and more nuclear weapons
Realism is a major theory in international relations that emphasises the role of power, national interest, and the absence of a central authority in shaping global politics
Core assumptions of Realism
Egoism: Humans are inherently selfish and competitive, leading to state egoism and conflict
Anarchy: There is no world government, creating an international system like a "state of nature"
Key themes of Realism
State egoism and conflict: Realists view states as the primary actors and competition for power as inevitable
Statecraft and the national interest: Realists acknowledge the role of skilled leadership but believe foreign policy should prioritise national security
International anarchy and its implications: The lack of central authority leads to a "self-help" system where states rely on themselves for security, creating a security dilemma and a tendency towards relative gains
Criticisms of Realism: Ignores the role of non-state actors and international institutions, Underestimates cooperation and the importance of ethical considerations
Realism vs. Liberalism
Realism emphasises power and conflict, while liberalism emphasises cooperation and shared interests
Realism remains influential due to the continued existence of anarchy in the international system
Neoclassical realism combines elements of classical realism and neorealism, emphasising the importance of statecraft
Realism claims to be realistic in world affairs, and views other theorists as non-realistic
Liberalism
Recognizes that individuals may have a plurality of interests, which is linked to the concept of competition and leads to human progress
Economic interdependence exists which is a positive factor as it means having trade relations which could help avoid war
States cooperate to ensure peace
Focuses on individuals
Realism
Focuses on states and how states can promote their power and security
Still today, realists believe that state sovereignty is one of the key features of global politics
Act in their own self-interest meaning maximising their security and power without hindering a nation's survival
They don't trust other states
Classical Realism
States act in self-interest for power and security because it's in their human nature
Morality should not interfere with national survival
Neorealism/Structural Realism
Sees the anarchic structure as a crucial factor
States accumulate power to maximise security
States act in their own self-interest which could lead to a security dilemma
Climate change is not a traditional focus for Realism, but it has gotten more attention from realists as it is a significant global issue
Reasons why international cooperation in tackling climate change is difficult for Realists
Self-interest: The main driver of states' behaviour is the protection of their national interests, so they may not have an incentive in taking action on climate change as this may harm their general interests
Politicians are generally short-sighted: Long-term investments in climate change which don't align with their self-interest might seem less pressing compared to issues with a more direct impact like re-election cycles
Cross-country resentment: Developing countries see developed nations as the main culprits for climate change and resent being asked to limit their growth
Realist solutions for climate change: Leadership should be taken by the largest/richest countries, rather than relying on the UN, because it is in their national interest to tackle the issue of climate change as it is a dramatic national threat. The public should put pressure on politicians. Promoting technology and innovation as the state would be working towards increasing the national power and investing in green technology may be a new way to maximise your power.