Save
...
paper 2
tort
damage
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Learn
Created by
Brooke Lennox
Visit profile
Cards (6)
Barnett
v Chelsea
'but for'
test
The
Wagon
Mound
test for
remoteness
of damage - injury or damage must be reasonably
foreseeable
Hughes
v Lord
Advocate
D liable if injury is
reasonably foreseeable
even if
precise
way it happened is not
Bradford
v
Robinson
Rentals
The precise
extent
of the harm need not be foreseeable as long as the
type
of harm is
foreseeable
Doughty
v
Turner
Asbestos
not
foreseeable
if
consequence
not
known
Smith
v
Leech
Brain
and Co
thin
skull
rule -
treat
victim
as you
find
them