Views humans are essentially self-determining and free to choose their own thoughts and actions
Views humans are essentially self-determining and free to choose their own thoughts and actions
A belief in free will does not deny that there may be biological and environment forces that exerts some influence on behaviour, but nevertheless implies that we are able to reject these forces if we wish because we are in control of our thoughts/ behaviour
Free will is a view of behaviour that is advocated by the humanistic approach
determinism
The idea that there is no control or choice on our course of action
Determinants of our behaviour come from a combination of sources such as biology, learning and unconscious thought
Due to years of debate and also in part due to the progression of psychological research, determinism has altered from an extreme stance to varying degrees of determinism hard and soft
hard determinism
This is sometimes referred to as fatalism and suggests that all human behaviour has a cause and in principle it should be possible to identify and describe these causes
Such a position always assumes that everything we think and do is dictated by internal or external forces that we cannot control
Methods- laboratory experiments, high controls, quantitative methods
soft determinism
The philosopher William James (1890)put forward a position became an important feature of the cognitive approach
thought that whilst it may be the job of scientists to explain what determines our behaviour not detract from the freedom we have to make rational conscious choices in everyday situations
Acknowledges that all humans action has a cause it also suggests some room for conscious control over the way they behave
the biological approach emphasises the role of biological determinism in behaviour
many of your physiological and neurological processes are not under our conscious control- such as the influence of the autonomic nervous system during periods of stress and anxiety
lots of behaviours and characteristics such as mental disorders are thought to have a genetic bases and research has demonstrated the effect of hormones- such as the role of testosterone in aggressive behaviour
genetic, brain physiology, biochemistry
genetic determinism
evolution and genetics- no gene has been identified that means behaviour will definitely occur
twin studies have not shown 100% concordance aggression and schizophrenia
therefore a hard deterministic standpoint cannot be proven so soft determinism accepted
brain physiology
areas of localisation suggest certain areas in the brain affect behaviour, therefore damage could effect behaviour
a girl had a tumour in limbic system was becoming increasingly violent and once removed aggression subsided
supports hard determinism
biochemistry
the dopamine hypothesis in schizophrenia have shown a relationship between biochemistry and behaviour
however determinism can be reduced through medication (choice to take)
psychic determinism
Freud, agreed that free will is like an illusion but placed more emphasis on the influence of biological drives and instincts than behaviourists
his particular brand of determinism sees human behaviour as determined and directed by unconscious conflicts, repressed in childhood
there is no such thing as an accident, according to Freud and even something as seemingly random or slip of the tongue (parapaxes) can be explained by the underlying authority of the unconscious
environmental determinism
BF Skinner described free will as an illusion and argued that all of beahviour is the result of conditioning
our experience of choice is because of reinforcement that have acted upon us
we might think we are acting independently but our behaviour has been shaped by environmental events as well as agents of socialisation- parents, teachers etc
social psychology, classical conditioning, operant conditioning, social learning theory
social psychology
environment shapes obedience/ conformity
classical conditioning
external trigger prompts behaviour had determinism
operant conditioning
consequences make behaviour more or lass likely to occur soft determinism
more likely to imitate the behaviour byt your cognition allows for choice it does not automatically occur
biological determinism has had hugely useful applications
Eg the development of treatments
As we are able to predict and control human behaviour in a scientific manner, therapies for OCD such as anti-depressants and anti-anxiety drugs can be effective
determinism also has some research support
Libet et al (1983)
Recorded EEG activity in motor areas of brain before the person had a conscious to move their finger
Suggesting that the choice was only a read-out of a pre-determined action
fMRI studies have since found activity in the prefrontal cortex can happen up to 10 seconds before the decision
However, Trevena and Miller (2009) suggested that the brain activity is simply a readiness to act rather than an intention to move
determinism is compatible with our notions of legal responsibility
Criminals are held to be personally and morally accountable for their actions
few individuals would represent themselves in court by trying to appeal to a judge that their behaviour was biologically, environmentally or physically determined
Only in extreme circumstances are juries instructed to act with greater leniency- eg when the Law of Diminished Responsibility is applied
This comes into play when, for various reasons a defendant is assumed not acted of their own free will eg self-defence and psychological disorders
thinking we have free will can improve our mental health
Roberts et al (2000) looked at teens who had a strong belief in fatalism
The study found that these teens were at significantly greater risk of developing depression
It seems that people who exhibit and external, rather than internal, locus of control are less likely to be optimistic
A positive relationship has also been found between perceived free will and job satisfaction (Feldman et al 2018)
the humanistic approach and free will
The concept of free will was central to Roger's client-centred therapy in that [people are seen as being free to change their lives by choosing to see their situation differently
Having removed the psychological barriers that may be preventing personal growth, people are free to work towards their potential (self actualisation)
cultural variations in perceived free will
Whilst there are many similarities in the perception of free will across cultures, some key differences have been found in relation to autonomy
Eg individualist cultures such as North America tend to assume greater free will and autonomy than more collectivist cultures like many Asian cultures (Gopnik and Kushnir 2014)
believing in free will in cultures that value the concept of free will might give greater benefits if it does have a social purpose
This was consistent across a number of different cultures