Explains how infants learn to become attached to their primarycaregiver through the process of either classical or operantconditioning.
(AO1) What is this theory sometimes referred to as?
Cupboard lovetheory because is it thought that infants will form an attachment to whoever feeds them
(AO1) Define classical conditioning
A process of learning by associatingtwo stimuli together to condition (learn) a response
(AO1) State the 2 steps within before classical conditioning
1)Before conditioning: Food = unconditionedstimulus which produces an unconditionedresponse (reflex) in the child - relief from hunger/pleasure
2)Before conditioning: Caregiver = neutralstimulus, who produces no conditioned response from child
(AO1) State the next 2 steps, during and after classical conditioning
3)During conditioning = the child associates the caregiver (neutralstimulus) who feeds them with the food (unconditionedstimulus)
4)Through repeated pairings, the caregiver becomes conditionedstimulus associated with the pleasure from feeding. Results in the caregiver causing a conditioned response from child (relief from hunger) = attachment.
(AO1) Draw a quick diagram of classical conditioning
UCS (food) --- UCR (reflex from child -relief from hunger)
NS (caregiver) --- No response
UCS (food) + NS (caregiver)
CS (caregiver) --- CR (relief)
(AO1) Define operant conditioning
Learning through reinforcements (positive/negative) as well as punishments
(AO1) Apply Dollard & Miller (1950) to operant conditioning
Applied the principles of reward and reinforcement to explain attachment between caregiver & infant.
Hungry infant= drive to reduce unpleasant feelings of discomfort = likely to cry to receive comfort.
Caregiver provides food = feeling of pleasure produced for infant (rewarding) = positive reinforcement. Crying likely to be repeated
This reinforcement = reciprocal process since caregiver also experiences reward, negative reinforcement as infant stops crying. Therefore, they too will repeat the behaviour.
(AO3) Give a limitation of learning theory
Point: The theory is undermined by Harlow
Evidence: Baby rhesus monkeys spent more time with towelling mother, even through it did not produce food in comparison to wire mother that did provide food.
Evaluate: Findings go against the learning theory 'cupboardlove' explanation of attachment & suggests that alternativeprocesses may have been ignored.
SUPPORT: Supported by Schaffer & Emerson, found that infants formed attachments to their mothers despite being fed by other carers.
(AO3) Give a limitation of learning theory
Point: Challenged by Lorenz
Evidence: Found that upon hatching, baby geese followed firstmovingobject they saw. Imprinting appears to be innate.
Evaluate: Shows that non-human animals demonstrate some inborn attachment behaviours to aid survival which goes against the idea that we 'learn' to attach to a caregiver because they feed us.
(AO3) Give a discussion of learning theory
Point: There is an alternative to the learning theory to explain human attachment proposed by Bowlby.
Evidence: He believed that infants have an innate readiness during the critical period to form an attachment to their caregiver to protect them from harm whilst young / vulnerable.
Evaluate: This evolutionary explanation of attachment maybe more helpful than just a simple stimulus - response association.