Inferences about internal mental processes are made on the basis of behaviour.
Internal mental processes are studied scientifically.
Theoretical and computer models are used to help explain mental processes.
Evaluating schemas: positives
schema help us predict what will happen in our world based on our experiences
schema enable us to process vast amounts of information rapidly
schema prevent us from becoming overwhelmed by environmental stimuli.
Evaluating schemas: negative
schema can distort our interpretation of sensory information
schema lead to perceptual errors or inaccurate EWT/memories
schema can cause biased recall/see what we expect
negative/faulty schema may have a negative impact on mental health
Assumptions of cognitive approach
internal mental processes can be studied
mental processes can involve schema
theoretical and computer models can be used
it is possible to make inferences about mental processes (eg from models)
neural mechanisms can be combined with cognitive processes in cognitive neuroscience.
Cognitive neuroscience AO1
aims to explore the neurobiological basis of thought processes and disorders
cognitive neuroscience has emerged with improvements in technology such as fMRI and PET scans
cognitive science was formally formed in MIT in 1956 and cognitive neuroscience was coined by George Miller and Michael Gazzaniga in the 1970s.
Cognitive neuroscience evaluation AO3
more scientific/objective in research study
nature/nurture debate - cognitive neuroscience has demonstrated the brain's plasticity throughout life supporting the role of experience
free will/determinism debate - cognitive neuroscience demonstrates the role of experience in shaping the brain showing biology is not destiny
research studies identifying neurological basis of mental processes, eg Tulving (1994) PET scan study on memory, Burnett et al. (2009) neurological network associated with guilt
Cognitive neuroscience evaluation AO3
provided neurobiological basis of certain psychological disorders (eg role of the parahippocampal gyrus in OCD) resulting in the development of new therapeutics and removing blame and stigma
ethics, eg controversial use of mind mapping for lie detection in courts
early identification for cognitive problems prior to observable behaviour has provided potential for early intervention
provides evidence to support previously controversial behavioural findings by illuminating mechanisms of cognitive development that underlie behavioural observations.