Something created by society and doesn’tnaturally exist
Ennew (globally)
Jamaica > children part of workforce, last priority is to play
Benedict (globally)
kids in non-industrial societies expected to be more responsible at home, to work
less value placed on obeying adults, sexual behaviour viewed differently
Globalfactor
> 150 million kids in developing countries involved in child labour
theorists: Ennew, Benedict
Aries (historically)
medieval paintings
> medieval Europe, children idea didnt exist (seen as ‘mini adults’ with same rights and duties
> likely due to high IMR, low expectation of life, large families, little education, most adults had childlike qualities
CRITICISM: in medieval times = laws prohibiting marriage under 12
Postman (historically)
printing press
> adulthood based on “reading competence” (those who couldread = adults, those who couldnt = children)
> created an ‘information hierarchy’ = adults had knowledge kids couldn’t access
Historical factor
Changes since 19/20th century that have changed kids position: lower IMR, specialist health knowledge, laws banning child labour/protection laws, compulsory schooling 1880, industrialisation
Socialclass factor
experience of childhood differs on social class position
> eg part time jobs, value on education, access to opportunities + toys
Gender factor
girls are expected to do morehousework chores
Hillman (gender)
boys allowed more freedom than girls, expected to be more independent, allowed to go out at night alone
ethnicityfactor
experience of childhood differs on ethnicity
Brannen (ethnicity)
Asian parents more likely to be stricter (especially towards daughters)
Conflictview - inequalitiesremain between children
> Hillman - gender - boys have more freedom
> Howard - class - diet
> Brannen - ethnicity - Asian parents strictness
Smart (conflict view - new sociology of childhood)
children are activeagents in creating their own childhood
> unstructured interviews with children experience in divorce
> children made situation better - allowed to express POV, draws attention to fact that children lack power to adults
Conflict view - inequalities remain between adults and children
Adults exert control (times, space, bodies, access to resources)
> Firestone - care + protection = oppression
> Gittins - age patriarchy
march of progressview
childhood has improved (Aries), now better than ever
families are increasingly child centered
> Toy shops, Tv programmes
Postman (future of childhood)
Disappearing
> decrease in info hierarchy > adults lose authority
> adults + kids same tv, language,intro to sex younger
> Uk = near top of league tables for obesity and SH
Lee (future of childhood)
Disappearing
> kids getting more rights = becoming more complex
Firestone (future of childhood)
Disappearing (good!)
> care and protecting are ways of controlling which is bad
Hood-Williams (future of childhood)
Disappearing
> Pester power - kids seen as consumers by companies
Opies (future of childhood)
Not Disappearing
> childhood still a distinct time and has its ownculture
eg. toys, books, nursery rhymes
Pilcher (future of childhood)
Not Disappearing
> kids have the right to happiness when adults dont
Postmodernist - Jenks (future of childhood)
Not disappearing, just changing
> relationships unstable = insecurity, but relationship with child is source of adults identity = parents more protective of childs security = separate status
Globalisation of WesternChildhood
> international humanitarian/welfare agencies assume western norms of childhood in other countries
> that country such activity may be the norm of the culture and important to prepare for adult life