Save
Research Methods
Validity and Reliability
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
Keira
Visit profile
Cards (36)
What is validity in the context of psychological research?
Validity is a measure of the
truth
of whether a test or experiment measures what it
claims
to measure.
View source
What does internal validity assess in a study?
Internal validity assesses how much the findings of the dependent variable are related to the
independent
variable,
excluding
other factors.
View source
Can you provide an example of a situation where internal validity might be lacking?
Participants responding to
demand characteristics
and acting as
expected
can indicate a lack of internal validity.
View source
What is external validity concerned with?
External validity is concerned with whether results can be
generalized
beyond the study to other settings,
populations
, or eras.
View source
What are the two main types of external validity?
Population
validity: Can results be
generalized
to the general population?
Ecological
validity: Can results be generalized to
real-world
settings?
View source
What is the concept of lack of mundane realism in external validity?
Lack of
mundane realism
refers to tasks that participants perform in a study that do not reflect
everyday life
, limiting the truth of the findings.
View source
What does temporal validity refer to?
Temporal
validity refers to whether the findings of a study or concepts of a
theory
hold true over time.
View source
Can you give an example of a study that lacks temporal validity?
Asch’s research on conformity lacks temporal validity as it was conducted during a very conformist time in American history.
View source
What is face validity?
Face validity is when an independent expert assesses whether a measure will measure what it is intended to measure.
View source
What is concurrent validity?
Concurrent validity involves comparing a new procedure with a similar procedure that has already established validity.
View source
What indicates that a test has strong concurrent validity?
A strong positive correlation of +0.8 between the new procedure and the established procedure indicates strong concurrent validity.
View source
How can validity be improved in experimental research?
Use a control group for comparison.
Standardize procedures to minimize effects of participants and investigator.
Implement single-blind and double-blind procedures to reduce demand characteristics.
View source
What are some ways to improve validity in observational research?
Minimize observer input, possibly using covert observations.
Ensure behavioral categories are specific, not overlapping, or ambiguous.
View source
How can validity be enhanced in questionnaires?
Include a lie scale to assess response consistency.
Ensure anonymity of participants' responses.
View source
Why might
qualitative
methods be considered more valid than
quantitative
methods?
They provide depth and detail that better reflects participants' realities.
Researchers must demonstrate
interpretive validity
, matching
interpretations
with participants' views.
View source
What is triangulation in research?
Triangulation involves using multiple sources of evidence, such as interviews, observations, and personal diaries, to enhance validity.
View source
What was Buss's research focused on regarding marriage partners?
Buss researched what women and men look for in a marriage partner by analyzing over
10,000
dating advertisements across
34
countries.
View source
What type of validity might be assessed in Buss's research?
The type of validity assessed in Buss's research could be
external
validity, as it involves
generalizing
findings across different cultures.
View source
What was the focus of the researcher interested in IQ levels across countries?
The researcher administered a test involving students naming
musical instruments
to assess
IQ levels
in different countries.
View source
What type of validity might be assessed in the IQ levels research?
The type of validity assessed in the IQ levels research could be
external
validity, as it involves
generalizing
findings across different countries.
View source
What was Ellison's research focused on regarding
aggression
?
Ellison studied how
aggressive
people can become when their identity is hidden using a driving
simulator
with students.
View source
What type of validity might be assessed in Ellison's research?
The type of validity assessed in Ellison's research could be
internal validity
, as it examines the relationship between the visibility of participants and their
aggressive
behavior.
View source
What is reliability in psychological research?
Reliability is a measure of
consistency
in results when a test or measure is
repeated.
View source
How is
reliability
assessed in psychology?
Reliability
is assessed by ensuring that a measure produces the
same
results each time it is carried out.
View source
What is external reliability?
External reliability refers to the ability of a test to produce the
same results
each time it is administered.
View source
What is the test-retest method?
The test-retest method involves administering the same test to the same participants at
different
times to assess
reliability.
View source
What correlation coefficient indicates high external reliability?
A high correlation coefficient of
+0.8
indicates that the test is
reliable.
View source
What is inter-observer reliability?
Inter-observer reliability refers to the
consistency
of observations made by different
observers
in observational research.
View source
How can internal reliability be assessed?
Internal reliability can be assessed using the
split-half
method, where a test is divided into
two halves
and the same participant takes both halves.
View source
What does improving reliability in questionnaires involve?
Improving reliability in questionnaires involves using the
test-retest
method and ensuring a
correlation coefficient
of +0.8.
View source
How can reliability be improved in interviews?
Reliability in interviews can be improved by using the same interviewer each time and
training interviewers
to avoid
leading
questions.
View source
Why are lab experiments often considered more reliable?
Lab experiments are considered more
reliable
due to the control over variables and
standardized procedures.
View source
How can observations be improved for reliability?
Observations can be improved by
operationalizing
behavioral categories to ensure they are
measurable
and not overlapping.
View source
What are the key issues with reliability in psychological research?
Lack of
replicability
indicates
unreliable
results.
Changes in measurement over time can affect
reliability.
View source
What are the methods for assessing
reliability
in psychological research?
External
reliability
:
Test-retest
method.
Inter-observer
reliability:
Consistency
among different observers.
View source
What are the ways to improve reliability in psychological research?
Use
test-retest
for questionnaires.
Ensure
consistent
interviewers and training.
Conduct
lab
experiments with controlled variables.
Operationalize
behavioral
categories in observations.
View source