Memory retrieval is most effective when the conditions at the time of encoding match the conditions at the time of retrieval.
Tulving and Thompson (1973)
what was the aim of Tulving and Parlstone and what was their method (retrieval failure)
aim - investigated retrieval failure using categories as cues
method- ppts given a total of 48 words to remember. The words were organised into 12 categories. at the start of each 4 word set was the category heading. ppts asked to recall sets of words but not the headings. control group were asked to remember as many as they could
how did Abernathy investigate context dependant cues?
students tested in various conditions
group 1 - in their teaching room by usual instructor
group 2- in their teaching room with different instructor
group 3- different room by their usual teacher
group 4- different room and different teacher
those tested in the same room and with the same instructor be formed best when tested
what are the strengths of retrieval failure?
abernethy’s experiment with 4 different groups
godden and baddely- tested context cues with divers. had to learn 40 words in one of four conditions
learned on land tested on land
learned on land tested in water
learned in water tested in water
learned in water tested on land
1 and 3 performed best
Godwin- men given a list of words to learn and recall 24 hours later. men who learned and recalled both times sober or drunk did best
what are the weaknesses of retrieval failure?
most studies lack mundane realism as they use word lists and are almost always tested 24 hours later.
danger of circularity- hard to prove forgetting has taken place as we dont know that it went into the person’s memory
context in real life has to be very different to affect recall