Misrepresentation

Cards (16)

  • Bisset v Wilkinson
    A misrepresentation is an untrue statement of fact with an inducing effect.
  • Dimmock v Halet
    A misrepresentation must be a statement of fact, and not of opinion. / part-truths defy the general rule for silence and can amount to
  • Attwood v Small
    The untrue statement of fact much cause the party to rely on itit and notnot their ownown judgement.
  •   Fletcher v Krell
    Misrepresentation cannot be given by silence.
  • Schneider v Heath
    If the seller hides a defect, this can amount to misrep
  • With v O'Flanogan
    If the seller fails to notify the buyer of a change of facts, this can amount to misrepresentation.
  • Lambert vv cooperative Insurance

    Umberimma Fides contracts  
  • Derry v Peak
    Fraudulent misrep-representor intentionally lies about a fact or is recklessreckless as to it's truth.
  • Smith New Court
    Fraudulent misrep- Dammages are a right including all loses that flow from the original fraud.
  • Hedley Byrne v Heller

    Special relationship must be used to prove negligent misrep under common law.
  • Misrepresentation Act 1967
    S2(1) stutory liability for negligent misstatement without having to prove special relationship
  • The Wagon Mound
    Only reasonably foreseeable damages can be claimed under common law for negligent misrep
  • Howard Marine v Ogden
    Generous damages under statue for negligent misrep
  • Leaf v International gallery
    Bars to rescission innocent: misrep lapse of time
  • Long v Lloyd
    Bars to rescission innocent misrep: representee affirms the contract
  • Vigers v Pike
    Bars to rescission innocent misrep: restitution is impossible