RL: Verificationism, Falsificationism & Language games

Cards (130)

  • What is the focus of the A Level Philosophy & Religious Studies summary notes?
    20th century religious language
  • What does verificationism claim about religious language?
    It is cognitive but meaningless
  • Who is associated with the verificationism approach?

    1. J. Ayer
  • What does Ayer argue about religious language?
    It expresses beliefs but is unverifiable and thus meaningless
  • What is the verification principle according to Ayer?
    A statement must be either analytic or empirically verifiable to be meaningful
  • What does Ayer mean by 'hard' verification?

    Using experience to verify something for certain as true or false
  • What is Ayer's 'weak' verification principle?
    Using experience to verify that something is probably true or false
  • Why did Ayer reject weak verification?

    It could give meaning to almost anything, including God
  • What are the two types of verification Ayer describes?
    Direct and indirect verification
  • What is direct verification?
    Verifying something through direct experience
  • What is indirect verification?
    Verifying something that cannot be directly experienced but can be verified in principle
  • How does Ayer illustrate indirect verification?
    By claiming there are mountains on the dark side of the moon
  • What does Ayer call the term 'God'?

    A metaphysical term
  • What is Ayer's conclusion about all religious language?

    It is meaningless because it is neither analytic nor empirically verifiable
  • What is Hick's counter to Ayer's verificationism?
    Religious language is empirically verifiable in an afterlife
  • What does Hick's parable of the celestial city illustrate?

    That one will discover the truth about God in the afterlife
  • What does Hick argue about God's verifiability?

    God is verifiable in principle, even if currently unverifiable
  • What is a criticism of Hick's argument regarding the afterlife?

    If there is no afterlife, we won't know the truth
  • What is a stronger criticism of Ayer's verification principle?

    It cannot pass its own test
  • Why can't the verification principle be analytic?

    It can be denied without contradiction
  • What does Ayer claim about the verification principle?

    It is a tool of empiricism to root out unempirical language
  • What was Ayer's goal in rejecting rationalist metaphysical language?
    To end the debate between rationalism and empiricism
  • Who rejected verificationism and invented falsificationism?
    Karl Popper
  • How does Popper's view of science differ from verificationism?

    Science works by trying to prove theories wrong, not just verifying them
  • What does Flew argue about religious language?

    It expresses beliefs that are unfalsifiable and thus meaningless
  • What does Flew mean by asserting that 'X' is the case?

    It is equivalent to asserting that 'not X' is not the case
  • What is the test of falsifiability according to Flew?
    We must be able to imagine how a belief could be false
  • Why do religious believers fail according to Flew?

    They cannot say what could prove their belief in God false
  • What does the parable of the gardener illustrate?
    Why unfalsifiable language fails to assert anything
  • What does Flew mean by 'death of a thousand qualifications'?

    It refers to diluting a concept to avoid falsification
  • What is Mitchell's counter to Flew's argument?
    Flew was wrong to think religious language is unfalsifiable
  • How does Mitchell illustrate his argument?

    With the example of a religious person abandoning faith after a child's death
  • What does Mitchell conclude about most religious belief?
    It is falsifiable, but people may not know how
  • What does Flew argue about the logical problem of evil?

    It shows that the existence of evil is inconsistent with the God of classical theism
  • What is Plantinga's free will defense?
    It claims that God cannot remove evil without removing the greater good of free will
  • What is the evidential problem of evil?
    It suggests that the amount of evil matters in relation to belief in God
  • What does Mitchell argue about the level of evil?
    Some unknown level of evil could counter religious belief
  • How do Ayer and Flew view religious language?
    As a failed attempt to describe reality
  • What is Hare's position on religious language?
    It expresses non-cognitive attitudes or emotions
  • How does Hare illustrate his theory?
    With the story of a paranoid student