Practical Art of Discourse - there is art in effective speaking and writing
Rhetorical tradition
Participation in discourse is important
Semiotic tradition
Intersubjective mediation of signs - signs represent something
Semiotic tradition
Words are symbols that mean nothing, meaning is in people's intentions
Phenomenological tradition
Experience of otherness - relationships and interactions with people with different identities help create communication processes that maintain / strengthen those relationships
Phenomenological tradition
Communication as the experience of self and others through dialogue
Phenomenological tradition
Two individuals cannot have the same experience
Cybernetictradition
INFORMATION PROCESSING - complex systems that consist of elements that interact and influence one another
Cybernetic tradition
How systems function or malfunction (Example: Communication model and how noise can stop information from being delivered)
SociopsychologicalTradition
Communication as EXPRESSION, INTERACTION, AND INFLUENCE
Sociopsychologicaltradition
Causes and effects of social behavior and practices that attempt to control those cause and effects
(Re)Production of social order
Socioculturaltradition
Symbolic processes that produce and reproduces shared sociocultural patterns
Sociocultural tradition
The understanding of reality / sociocultural patterns are obtained through communication (Example: Wearing red as a sign of beauty and love in INDIA)
Critical tradition
Communication as Discursive Reflection
Criticaltradition
Social injustices are caused by distorted ideologies
Criticaltradition
Through criticalreflectionandconsciousness-raising communication processes, we are able to restore social justice
Critical tradition
Power imbalances are caused by language control (Example: Feminists argue that women don't speak in full voice because men control the language.)
Robert T. Craig
Proponent
UniversityofColorado, Boulder
Where the proponent is a retired professor
MichiganStateUniversity
Where the proponent got his MA and PHD
UniversityofWisconsin-Madison
Where the proponent got his BA in speech
May 1999
Year proposed
ReconstructedtraditionsofCommunicationTheory
Rhetorical, Semiotic, Phenomenological, Cybernetic, Sociopsychological, sociocultural, and critical tradition
Multidisciplinaryorigins (Historical context)
Too many disciplinary approaches in comm, making it incoherent
Sterileeclecticismtoproductivefragmentation
Theories are developed but no field
Sterile eclecticism to productive fragmentation
Communication research is fragmented with no coherent focus
Sterile Eclecticism to Productive Fragmentation
More and more theories are made but they cannotself-sustainasawhole
Dialogical-dialecticalcoherence
The key to achieve coherence in communication theory as a field
Commonawareness of how theoriescomplementand have tensionwithothercommtheories
The goal of dialogical-dialectical coherence
ConstitutiveModelofCommunicationasaMetamodel
1 of two principles as the basis of the theoretical matrix
ConstitutiveModelofCommunicationasaMetamodel
Theoretical models can interact
Communication is theorized into manyperspectives > field of theory becomes a forum to discuss other alternativepracticaltheories
Theoretical metadiscourse - discussion about alternative theories (Communication theory as a metadiscourse)
(Re)Production of socialorder
Sociocultural tradition
Goal of dialogical-dialectical coherence
To produce a staticfield where communication is endlessly evolving in a surrounding of contingency and conflict
Multidisciplinary origins
It states that various disciplines neither agree nor disagree with each other
Communication theory as a field has no consensus or generalagreement
[Dialogical-dialectical field] Reconstructingcommunication theory withinapracticaldiscipline > revealing how they complementeachother and their tensions > coherence of communication as a field