Self-Disclosure

    Cards (20)

    • Self-disclosure is the act of revealing personal information about oneself to another person
    • Self-disclosure is not a set and stable type of communication and varies per individual depending on:
      • age
      • relationship status
      • mood
    • Social Penetration Theory was proposed by Altman and Taylor in 1973
    • Social Penetration Theory describes the process of Self-disclosure beginning with shallow levels of disclosure and gradually progressing deeper
    • Social Penetration Theory (1973):
      1. Superficial (breadth not depth)
      2. Intimate (ambitions)
      3. Personal (hopes, desires and insecurities)
      4. Core (innermost fears)
    • Social penetration theory suggests that as each ‘layer’ is peeled away the relationship becomes stronger
    • Social Comparison Safety was proposed by Festinger (1954)
    • Social Comparison Theory (1954) describes the ways in which an individual will assess their own worth and value by comparing themselves to others
    • Social Comparison Theory (1954):
      1. Upward comparison - feel that their partner is superior to them (e.g. better-looking, richer)
      2. Downward comparison - feel that their partner is inferior to them
    • Social Comparison Theory (1954) states that disclosure could lead to self-validation or determining how similar you are to a person
    • How does Self-Disclosure affect attraction and relationships?
      • SPT argues that SD is essential for a relationship
      • SPT claims that SD is a glue that reinforces a bond
    • How does Self-Disclosure affect attraction and relationships?
      • Disclosing high personal details can lead to vulnerability
      • SCT suggest that people engage in social comparison via SD to determine whether to pursue the relationship
    • Self-Disclosure Research - Collins and Miller (1994):
      A meta-analysis showing that SD plays a key role in relationship maitenance
    • Self-Disclosure Research - Tang et al (2013):
      American couples make more Self disclosure then Chinese couples but relationship satisfaction was high in both (cultural variation)
    • PEEL Paragraphs - Self Disclosure:
      1. Strength - Real life application
      2. Strength - Supporting Study
      3. Weakness - Subjective explanation
      4. Weakness - Not a full explanation
      5. Weakness - Cultural variations
    • Self-Disclosure PEEL Paragraph 1:
      Strength - RLA - Self-disclosure emphasis open communication and can be used to inform relationship counselling
    • Self-Disclosure PEEL Paragraph 2:
      Strength - Supporting Study - Sprecher and Hendrick (2004) - studied heterosexual dating couples
      • found a strong correlation between satisfaction and disclosure
      • SD led to more satisfied and committed relationships
    • Self-Disclosure PEEL Paragraph 3:
      Weakness - SD is subjective, therefore it is hard to operationalise
      • lacks features of science
    • Self-Disclosure PEEL Paragraph 4:
      Weakness - not a full explanation - SD doesn’t account for all relationships and they are still healthy
    • Self-Disclosure PEEL Paragraph 5:
      Weakness - Cultural differences - findings are often from western cultures and so can’t be generalised
      (Tang et al)
    See similar decks