nanda

• What is the time frame for the NANDA International Taxonomy edition discussed in the introduction?

  2018–2020
• What major changes are included in the new edition of the NANDA International Taxonomy?

  New and revised diagnoses, retired diagnoses, label changes, standardization of diagnostic indicator terms, and introduction of associated conditions and at-risk populations
• Who led the process of adopting at-risk populations and associated conditions in the NANDA-I taxonomy?

  Dr. Shigemi Kamitsuru
• What was the goal of the changes made to the diagnostic indicators in the NANDA-I taxonomy?

  To increase the standardization of the terms used within the diagnostic indicators
• What type of feedback influenced the changes made in the 2018–2020 edition of the NANDA-I taxonomy?

  Feedback from users, students, and clinicians
• What new information has been added to the NANDA-I taxonomy in this edition?

  Information on clinical reasoning
• What are the processes and procedures for diagnosis submission and review in NANDA-I?

  • Proposed diagnoses undergo a systematic review.
  • Submissions are staged according to evidence supporting development or validation.
  • Diagnoses can be submitted at various levels of development.
  • The review process is under review for stronger evidence-based practices.
• What does LOE stand for in the context of NANDA-I diagnosis submission?

  Level of Evidence
• What is the purpose of the NANDA-I Education and Research Committee regarding LOE criteria?

  To review and revise the criteria to better reflect evidence-based nursing
• What is the first level of evidence (LOE 1) in the NANDA-I taxonomy?

  Received for Development (Consultation from NANDA-I)
• What is required for a diagnosis to be categorized as LOE 1.2?

  The label must be clear, and the definition must be consistent with the label
• How does LOE 2 differ from LOE 1 in the NANDA-I taxonomy?

  LOE 2 indicates acceptance for publication and inclusion in the taxonomy, while LOE 1 indicates a diagnosis is still in development
• What are the levels of evidence (LOE) in the NANDA-I taxonomy?

  • LOE 1: Received for Development
  • LOE 2: Accepted for Publication
  • LOE 3: Clinically Supported
• How many new nursing diagnoses were approved in the 2018–2020 edition?

  Seventeen new diagnoses
• What was the reason for retiring eight nursing diagnoses in this edition?

  They were inconsistent with current literature or lacked sufficient evidence
• What are the changes made to nursing diagnosis labels in the NANDA-I taxonomy?

  • Changes were made to 11 nursing diagnosis labels.
  • Changes ensure consistency with current literature.
  • Labels reflect human responses.
• What is the new label for the previous diagnosis "Deficient diversional activity"?

  Decreased diversional activity engagement
• What has been the focus of the standardization of diagnostic indicator terms in the NANDA-I taxonomy?

  To decrease variation in terms used for defining characteristics, related factors, and risk factors
• What is the process used for standardizing diagnostic indicator terms in the NANDA-I taxonomy?

  • Individual review of assigned domains.
  • Independent review by a second reviewer.
  • Joint review of terms by both reviewers.
• What is the focus of the safety/protection section in the study material?

  Latex allergy response
• What was the goal of the work undertaken in the previous cycle of the book?

  To decrease variation in terms used for defining characteristics, related factors, and risk factors
• Why was the standardization of terms important in the study material?

  It improves clarity and consistency for clinicians and translators
• What process was used to standardize the diagnostic indicator terms?

  Individual review followed by independent review and consensus meetings
• What was the purpose of filtering similar terms during the standardization process?

  To ensure consistency and clarity in terminology
• What is one of the notable benefits of the standardization of terms?

  Improved translations of nursing diagnoses
• How does the dual meaning of the word "lack" create confusion for clinicians?

  It can mean both absence of and insufficient, complicating translations
• Why is it important to maintain clarity in defining characteristics in nursing diagnoses?

  It impacts clinical judgment and decision-making
• What are at-risk populations as defined in the study material?

  Groups of people sharing characteristics that make them susceptible to particular human responses
• What are associated conditions in the context of nursing diagnoses?

  Medical diagnoses, injuries, procedures, or pharmaceutical agents that support accuracy in nursing diagnosis
• What significant change occurred in NANDA International in 2002?

  It changed its name from North American Nursing Diagnosis Association to NANDA International, Inc.
• Why is it important for nurses to be aware of global nursing practices?

  It informs discussions and may support the broadening of nursing practice across countries
• What was the outcome of the International Think Tank Meeting held by NANDA-I in 2009?

  Discussions on how to handle differences in nursing practice and regulations worldwide
• What is the purpose of NANDA International position statements?

  To clarify NANDA-I's stance on important issues and prevent misunderstandings
• What does NANDA International recommend regarding the use of assessment frameworks?

  To use an evidence-based nursing framework to guide assessments
• What is the structure of a nursing diagnosis statement according to NANDA International?

  It includes the diagnosis label and related factors as exhibited by defining characteristics
• How does NANDA International define "patient"?

  As an individual, family, group, or community
• Why is it important for nurses to validate accurate diagnoses?

  It ensures that the nursing diagnosis is linked to the patient's assessment
• What is the significance of the NANDA-I taxonomy in nursing?

  It highlights and renders visible the unique contribution of nursing to global health
• What are the key components of the standardization process for diagnostic indicator terms?

  • Individual review of assigned domains
  • Independent review by a second reviewer
  • Consensus meetings to resolve discrepancies
  • Filtering for similar terms to ensure consistency
• What are the implications of the changes made in the NANDA-I taxonomy for nursing practice?

  • Improved clarity and consistency in terminology
  • Enhanced translation processes for non-native speakers
  • Better support for accurate nursing diagnoses and treatment plans
  • Increased awareness of global nursing practices