Save
...
Beliefs in Society
Theories of Religion
Functionalist theories of Religion
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Learn
Created by
lucy coughlan
Visit profile
Cards (19)
Functionalists
argue religion is a
conservative
force which promotes
social harmony
and reinforces
value consensus
Durkheim
says religion socialises members into a
collective conscience
, and sets certain values apart and encourages collective worship
The Sacred according to
Durkheim
is objects/places/animals etc which are considered apart and
forbidden
The Profane according to
Durkheim
is non-sacred items but normal and
mundane
Totemism was developed by
Durkheim
by studying aborginal
australians
which connects and represents social connections
Liberation
Theology was founded by Christian priests and focussed on reducing
poverty
- which supports collective worship
New Christian Right creates
hate
which challenges the belief that religion brings society
together
Following the murder of
James Bulger
the Catholic Church created a book of
condolences
showing religion can bring society together
The Israel -
Palestine
war shows
religion
can divide people
Durkheim
relied of second hand accounts about aboriginal
australians
Durkheims
theories may only be applicable to
small
scale societies so is not generalisable
There is many
conflicts
today in religion
Malinowksi
said religion provided a
psychological function
Malinowski found religion provided comfort when an answer is uncertain or in a time of crisis
Malinowskis
research may be outdated as it is a
pre-industrial society
Malinowski
was an outsider in his study so he may have
misintepreted
his data
Parsons
says religion can help individuals cope with unforeseen events and
uncontrollable
outcomes
Parsons
says religion can promote
value
consensus
and answer the
’ultimate
question’
Functionalists fail to account for
conflicts
that can occur among
religions