'take such care as in all the circumstances... is reasonable to see that the visitor will be reasonably safe in using the premises for the purposes for which he is invited or permitted by the occupier to be there'
Laverton v Kiapasha takeaway supreme
Premises don't have to be completely safe, just 'reasonably safe'
Rochester Cathedral v Debell
Tripping, slipping and falling are everyday occurrences and accidents happen
Cole v Davis-Gilbert
Duty does not have to extend to liability for pure accidents or last indefinitely where there could be other causes of damage
S.2(3)(a)
the occupier 'must be prepared for children to be less careful than adults (and as a result) the premises must be reasonably safe for a child of that age'
Glasgow Corporation v Taylor
Occupier has to protect child visitors from allurements
Phipps v Rochester Corporation
Occupier can expect parents to supervise very young children
Jolley v London Borough of Sutton
Occupier liable for injuries suffered by children that are reasonably foreseeable
2(3)(b)
'An occupier may expect that a person, in the exercise of his calling , will appreciate and guard against any special risks ordinarily incidental to it, so far as the occupier leaves him free to do so'
Roles v Nathan
Occupier can expect workmen to appreciate and guard against risk that are incidental to their work
