voting rights in the WB are proportional to the country’s financial contribution
countries with larger financial contributions have more voting power, which can influence decision making
this means that poorer nations have negligible influence
The G7 countries such as France, Germany, Italy hold 45% of the voting rights while many poorer nations only hold less than 0.1% of the voting rights
Profit-driven
The world bank operates like a financial institutions, pursuing profits and returns on investments
This profit motive can lead to decisions that prioritise financial returns over sustainable development
Eg. For every dollar that the US invests in the WB, it receives $1.10 and the UK receives $1.90. This financial dynamic raises concerns about whether the Bank’s policies favour wealthier countries
Environment sustainability issues
Many WB projects have been criticised for lacking environmental sustainability
Environment assessments are often conducted too late, and there is inadequate public consultation. The oversight can lead to significant ecological damage
Eg. The Carajas iron ore project in the Amazon caused deforestation equivalent to the size of England and France combined. Similarly the Polonoroeste Highway project not only destroyed vast areas of rainforest but also led to the resettlement of 30,000 families