One strength of CBT is the large body of evidence supporting its effectiveness for treating depression:
March et al. compared CBT to antidepressant drugs and also to a combination of both when treating 327 depressed adolescents and found that after 36 weeks, 81% of the CBT group, 81% of the antidepressant group and 86% of the combination group were significantly improved
CBT is also cost-effective
Therefore, CBT is widely seen as the first choice of treatment in the NHS
Suitability for diverse clients
One limitation of CBT for depression is the lack of effectiveness for severe cases and for clients with learning disabilities:
In some cases depression can be so severe that clients cannot motivate themselves to engage with the cognitive work of CBT
The complex rational thinking involved makes it unsuitable for treating clients with learning disabilities
Sturmey suggests that any form of psychotherapy is not suitable for people with learning disabilities
Therefore, CBT may only be appropriate fora a specific range of people with depression
Counterpoint to suitability for diverse clients
There is evidence that challenges this:
Lewis and Lewis concluded that CBT was as effective as antidepressant drugs and behavioural therapies for severe depression
Taylor et al. concluded that when used appropriately, CBT is effective for people with learning difficulties
Therefore, CBT may be suitable for a wider range of people than was once thought
Relapse rates
One limitation of CBT for the treatment of depression is its high relapse rates:
Relatively few early studies of CBT for depression looked at long-term effectiveness. Some more recent studies suggest that long-term outcomes are not as good as had been assumed
Ali et al. assessed depression in 439 clients every month for 12 months following a course for CBT and found that 42% of the clients relapsed into depression within six months of ending treatment and 53% relapsed within a year
Therefore, CBT may need to be repeated periodically