Professor of Christian Doctrine at King's College London
Regius Professor of Divinity at Oxford
Anglican priest
Wiles approves of Tillich's view that miracles are sign events
God has been thought to interfere in the laws of cause and event to perform miracles, or to guide humans along the best path
Wiles says it would be immoral if God were to intervene or guide someone's path
Wiles is suggesting that God would be selecting who is to be healed and who is not, this suggests an unloving God
If God did selectively intervene, the problem of evil would be unsolvable
There'd be no reason why God couldn't intervene all the time
To avoid the problem of evil- God should not intervene at all
Wiles seeks to shift the argument of miracles away from Hume's questions about the evidence for whether an event can be explained in natural terms
Wiles wants to change the debate to be about what an event reveals concerning God's intentions for the world
The healing ministry of Jesus is firmly set within the context of a conflict with evil
Deus ex machina- a God from the machine
Wiles argues that Jesus refused Satan's trap of trying to use miracles as evidence of divine power
Wiles says that God does not intervene 'from above' to perform miracles
Miracles are not factual descriptions
Miracles tell us something about God; Jesus's refusal to provide an overwhelmingly convincing miracle illustrates how mistaken it is to try and use accounts of miracles as proof of God's power
Wiles says that there is one exception: creation itself is a miracle