how consistent the results are. if the experiment is repeated, will the same or highly similar results occur again? if the answer is yes, the study possesses high reliability.
validity
the extent to which a test measures what it claims to measure.
face validity
does it look like it's measuring what it says?
control
how well the experimenter has controlled the variables. important to establish cause and effect relationships.
test of reliability:
test-retest method. after a period of time, some participants do the same test and compare.
mundane realism
how well an experimental task reflects real life. if a task has high mundane realism it would likely be high in ecological validity.
ecological validity
the extent to which you can apply the findings of an experiment to other situations/environments
if an experiment is lacking in realism we may be unable to generalise
external validity refers to whether the study is a true representation of behaviour outside of the specific experimental setting
internal validity refers to things that happen inside the study such as whether we can be certain that it was the IV which caused the change in the DV
internal validity can be effected by:
lack of mundane realism - leading the participants to act unnaturally
extraneous variables
3 types of ext validity
ecological validity
population validity
temporal validity
population validity
how well the results can be generalised on a larger population
temporal validity
the extent to which you can generalise a study across time.