PRIVATE NUISANCE

Cards (16)

  • Hunter v Canary Wharf
    Only people with a legal interest in land can sue
  • Malone v Laskey
    family members nor lodgers cannot sue
  • St Helens v Smelting v Tipping
    location is irrelevant if the interference causes physical damage to property
  • Halsey v Esso
    Industrial activities are more likely to be a nuisance in residential areas
  • Spicer v Smee
    an isolated incident was considered a nuisance
  • Murdoch v Glacier Metal
    A claim in private nuisance will fail if the activity does not interfere with ordinary existence
  • Hollywood Silver Fox Farm v Emmet
    Deliberate harmful acts will be nuisance,
  • Christie v Davey

    Piano lessons, retaliated by making more noise
  • Dennis v Ministry of Defence

    C owned a country house but had to put up with RAF training jest flying overhead. It was a nuisance and was awarded damages but not an injunction to prevent it as the activity was for the benefit of national security
  • Hammersmith Railway v Brand
    vibrations from trains were an inevitable consequence of the existence of the railway and an injunction could not be granted as the railway would be prevented from functioning
  • Allen v Gulf Oil
    fumes and noise from oil refinery being built was under the authority of Parliament
  • Sturges v Bridgman
    doctor built a consultation room next to a workshop that has been operating for over 20 years
    failed as the nuisance only began when the consultation room was built
  • Sedleigh Denfield v O'Callaghan
    If a trespasser comes onto D's land and creates a nuisance D will not be liable unless he knew something and did nothing
  • Miller v Jackson
    Injunction was refused because there was a public interest in preserving playing fields
  • Wagon Mound
    only damages that are reasonably foreseeable can be claimed for
  • Dennis v Ministry of Defence
    You cannot claim for personal injury