location is irrelevant if the interference causes physicaldamage to property
Halsey v Esso
Industrialactivities are more likely to be a nuisance in residential areas
Spicer v Smee
an isolatedincident was considered a nuisance
Murdoch v Glacier Metal
A claim in privatenuisance will fail if the activity does notinterfere with ordinaryexistence
HollywoodSilver Fox Farm v Emmet
Deliberate harmful acts will be nuisance,
Christie v Davey
Piano lessons, retaliated by making more noise
Dennis v Ministry of Defence
C owned a countryhouse but had to put up with RAF training jest flying overhead. It was a nuisance and was awardeddamages but not an injunction to prevent it as the activity was for the benefit of national security
HammersmithRailway v Brand
vibrations from trains were an inevitable consequence of the existence of the railway and an injunction could not be granted as the railway would be prevented from functioning
Allen v Gulf Oil
fumes and noise from oilrefinery being built was under the authority of Parliament
Sturges v Bridgman
doctor built a consultation room next to a workshop that has been operating for over20 years
failed as the nuisance only began when the consultationroom was built
SedleighDenfield v O'Callaghan
If a trespasser comes onto D's land and creates a nuisance D will not be liable unless he knew something and did nothing
Miller v Jackson
Injunction was refused because there was a publicinterest in preserving playing fields
Wagon Mound
only damages that are reasonably foreseeable can be claimed for