in psychological research, it is important that participants are protected from any negative effects of having taken part in the study
ethical issues
when there is a conflict between the rights of participants to be safe and the goals of research to produce variable data
BPS
british psychological society
BPS Code of Ethics and Conduct (2009) identifies four principles
respect for the dignity and worth of all persons.
competence - maintenance of high standards.
responsibility - protecting participants from harm
integrity - honest and accurate
intentional deception is only acceptable when it is necessary to protect research integrity. deception should be disclosed to all participants at the earliest opportunity.
participants should be aware of right to withdraw at any time.
psychologists must debrief participants at the end. if participants were deceived, during the debrief the true aim of research should be revealed
ethics
standards that the BPS has produced that guide psychological research. there are 4 key principles: respect, competence, integrity, responsibility
one way to judge the acceptability of the research design is to consider whether participants are likely to object or show unease when debriefed.
6 main issues that can cause conflict between researchers and participants in psychological research:
informed consent
deception
right to withdraw
protection from harm
confidentiality
privacy
participant should be made aware of the aims of the research, the procedures, right to withdraw, and what their data will be used for.
participants should be able to make a decision without feeling concerned or oblidged.
asking for fully informed consent can make the data invalid (demand characteristics)
researchers should not deceive without a good cause
if a participant agrees to participate without knowing the true aim and task then they might become distressed (meaning the researcher has failed to protect them from harm)
if the information about the aims of the research are withheld, participants can not give informed consent.
when trying to balance informed consent and gathering meaningful data, it can be necessary to deceive participants about the true aims of the research
there's an important distinction between withholding some details of the research aims (reasonably acceptable) and deliberately providing false information (less acceptable)
participants must be able to withdraw at any point. especially if they feel uncomfortable or distressed. it is even more important if they have been deceived (no informed consent)
if participants do leave it can bias results
participants who stayed in the study are likely to be different to those who withdrew (higher level of resilience, more obedient). this leads to a bias sample as the types of people who withdrew are no longer represented
nothing should happen to the participant that causes harm (physical or psychological).
it is considered acceptable when the risk of harm is no greater than they would experience in everyday life
participants should leave the study in the same state they entered.
studying important psychological questions may involve a risk of distress.
it can be difficult for researchers to predict all the potential outcomes of certain procedures (Stanford prison experiment).
any potential harm needs to be communicated to the participants so they can give informed consent
the data protection act makes confidentiality a legal right.
it is only acceptable for personal data to be recorded if the data is made in a format which does not identify the participant.
it is difficult to protect confidentiality because researchers want to publish their findings. to overcome this, a researcher can guarantee anonymity by using numbers instead of names so individuals cannot be identified.
there are certain situations where people do not expect to be observed (in their own homes). this can be an invasion of privacy
some research topics require participants to be unaware that they are a participant until the research has ended/data has been collected.
researchers must be careful that they do not invade the privacy of others